Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan/Feb;31(1):e45-e50.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005852.

Outcomes of Surgical Management of Palatal Fistulae in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate

Rafael Denadai  1 , Guilherme Luis Zanco, Cesar Augusto Raposo-Amaral, Celso Luiz Buzzo, Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral
Affiliations

Outcomes of Surgical Management of Palatal Fistulae in Patients With Repaired Cleft Palate

Rafael Denadai et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb.

Abstract

Background: The palatal fistula is an important surgical challenge within the longitudinal follow-up of patients with repaired cleft palate as the success rate of palatal fistula reconstruction by adopting several surgical techniques is variable and often unsatisfactory. The purpose of this retrospective study was to report the clinical outcomes of an algorithm for the surgical management of palatal fistulae in patients with repaired cleft palate.

Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 101) with repaired cleft palate and palatal fistula-related symptoms who were treated according to a specific algorithm between 2009 and 2017 were included. Based on the anatomical location (Pittsburgh fistula types II-V), amount of scarring (minimal or severe scarred palate), and diameter of the fistula (≤5 mm or >5 mm), 1 of 3 approaches (local flaps [62.4%], buccinator myomucosal flaps [20.8%], or tongue flaps [16.8%]) was performed. For clinical outcome assessment, symptomatic and anatomical parameters (fistula-reported symptoms and residual fistula, respectively) were combined as follows: complete fistula closure with no symptoms; asymptomatic narrow fistula remained; or failure to repair the fistula ("good," "fair," or "poor" outcomes, respectively). Surgical-related complication data were also collected.

Results: Most patients (91.1%) presented "good" clinical outcomes, ranging from 86.2% to 100% (86.2%, 100%, and 100% for local flaps, buccinator flaps, and tongue flaps, respectively). All (8.9%) "fair" and "poor" outcomes were observed in fistulae reconstructed by local flaps. All "poor" (5%) outcomes were observed in borderline fistulae (4-5 mm). No surgical-related complications (dehiscence, infections, or necrosis) were observed, except for an episode of bleeding after the 1st stage of tongue flap-based reconstruction (1.0%).

Conclusion: A high rate of fistula resolution was achieved using this algorithm for surgical management of palatal fistulae in patients with repaired cleft palate.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rossell-Perry P. Two methods of cleft palate repair in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 2018; 29:1473–1479.
    1. Li J, Gerety PA, Johnston J, et al. Gelfoam interposition minimizes risk of fistula and postoperative bleeding in modified-furlow palatoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28:1993–1996.
    1. Moores C, Shah A, Steinbacher DM. Cleft palate repair using a double opposing Z-plasty. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27:e444–e445.
    1. Sullivan SR, Marrinan EM, LaBrie RA, et al. Palatoplasty outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with cleft palate: a 29-year assessment of one surgeon's experience. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20: (Suppl 1): 612–616.
    1. Hardwicke JT, Landini G, Richard BM. Fistula incidence after primary cleft palate repair: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134:618e–627e.

LinkOut - more resources