Delivery in Myopic Women: A Comparison of Mode of Delivery in Years 1990, 2000, and 2010
- PMID: 31609961
- PMCID: PMC6812470
- DOI: 10.12659/MSM.916479
Delivery in Myopic Women: A Comparison of Mode of Delivery in Years 1990, 2000, and 2010
Abstract
BACKGROUND A belief has existed for many years that severe myopia is a direct indication for cesarean section or an instrumental vaginal delivery, although many academic papers negated this opinion. The aim of this study was to analyze the mode of delivery of myopic patients in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010. MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical records of 3027 women in labor from the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw were analyzed in 3 time periods: year 1990 - group 1 (G1), year 2000 - group 2 (G2), and 2010 - group 3 (G3). Maternal age, severity and proportion of myopia, ophthalmological consultations, and mode of delivery were assessed. RESULTS In G1 there were 992 patients, in G2 there were 1010 patients, and in G3 there were 1025 patients. Myopic women in labor accounted for 20% of G1, 12% of G2, and 20% of G3. The mean maternal age was ±29.4 years in G1, ±30 years in G2, and ±31.5 years in G3. Myopia was divided into 3 levels of severity depending on the degree of refractive error: low myopia -6 DS. The number of ophthalmological examinations needed in myopic patients to decide on the mode of delivery showed an increasing tendency over the evaluated years, but the rates of referrals for cesarean section/assisted delivery decreased. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of myopic women in labor receiving ophthalmological consultations showed an increasing trend over time. Despite publication of the Ophthalmology-Obstetrics Consensus of the Polish Society of Ophthalmology guidelines, myopia still remains an indication for cesarean section (cesarian section), but not to shorten the second stage of delivery.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Figures


Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of changes in the mode of twin deliveries over the years].Ginekol Pol. 2012 Oct;83(10):754-9. Ginekol Pol. 2012. PMID: 23383561 Polish.
-
[Predictors of birth outcomes related to women with a previous caesarean section: experience of a Motherhood Center, Bizerte].Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Oct 10;25:76. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.76.9164. eCollection 2016. Pan Afr Med J. 2016. PMID: 28292039 Free PMC article. French.
-
Cesarean Delivery in Adolescents.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Oct;29(5):443-447. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2016.01.123. Epub 2016 Feb 1. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26836505
-
[Cesarean section and eye disorders].Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(3):217-21. doi: 10.17772/gp/61752. Ginekol Pol. 2016. PMID: 27306132 Review. Polish.
-
Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 32889327
Cited by
-
Immediate post partum macular subretinal bleeding in a highly myopic patient: a case report.BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01814-9. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33478418 Free PMC article.
-
A State-of-the-Art Review of Ophthalmological Indications for a Cesarean Section: Is There a Patient for Whom a Cesarean Section Is Really Indicated?Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 9;15(4):418. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040418. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40002569 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors Associated with the Type of Cesarean Section in Greece and Their Correlation with International Guidelines.Acta Inform Med. 2021 Mar;29(1):38-44. doi: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.38-44. Acta Inform Med. 2021. PMID: 34012212 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Atassi A. Intraocular pressure variations during delivery. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1972;32:832–34. - PubMed
-
- Iancu G, Coviltir V, Iancu R, Corbu C. Particularities of myopia in pregnancy. Gineco Eu. 2013;9:196–99.
-
- Kuba GB, Kroll P. [Labor monitoring and indications for abortion and cesarean section in eye diseases – an overview]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1997;211:349–53. [In Grerman] - PubMed
-
- Socha M, Piotrowiak I, Jagielska I, et al. [Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000–2008 – our own experience]. Ginekol Pol. 2010;81:188–91. [in Polish] - PubMed
-
- Ophthalmology-Obstetrics Consensus of Polish Society of Ophthalmology. 2014;10:06.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical