Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 20;64(1):e01031-19.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01031-19. Print 2019 Dec 20.

Activity of Hospital Disinfectants against Vegetative Cells and Spores of Clostridioides difficile Embedded in Biofilms

Affiliations

Activity of Hospital Disinfectants against Vegetative Cells and Spores of Clostridioides difficile Embedded in Biofilms

Tasnuva Rashid et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile spores can survive in the environment in either mono- or mixed-species biofilms. However, no previous studies have investigated chemical disinfection of C. difficile spores embedded in biofilms. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the in vitro effectiveness of hospital disinfectants against C. difficile spores embedded within biofilms. Five unique C. difficile strains embedded in three different biofilm types grown for 72 or 120 h were exposed to seven different hospital disinfectants. C. difficile abundance [as log(number of CFU/milliliter)] was calculated after manufacturer-determined contact times along with biofilm biomass and microscopy. The primary analysis compared differences between C. difficile vegetative cell and spore counts as well as amounts of biomass after exposure to disinfectants. C. difficile vegetative cells and spores were recovered from biofilms regardless of the type of biofilm growth or biofilm growth time. No disinfectant was able to completely eliminate C. difficile from the biofilms. Overall, Clorox, ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA), and Virex were most effective at killing C. difficile spores regardless of biofilm age, ribotype, or wash conditions (whether biofilms are washed or unwashed) (P = 0.001, each). Clorox and OPA were also effective at killing total vegetative cell growth (P = 0.001, each), but Virex was found to be ineffective against vegetative cell growth in biofilms (P = 0.77). Clorox and Virex were most effective in reducing biomass, followed by Nixall, OPA, and Vital Oxide. No disinfectant was able to completely eliminate C. difficile embedded within biofilms although differences among disinfectants were noted. Future research will be required to determine methods to eradicate this persister reservoir.

Keywords: anaerobic infections; biofilm; environmental decontamination; in vitro study; ribotype 027.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Biofilm mass for different C. difficile ribotypes. B1, C. difficile monospecies biofilm; B2, mixed-species biofilm grown anaerobically; B3, mixed-species biofilm grown aerobically.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Biofilm embedded C. difficile spore and vegetative cell counts (log CFU counts/milliliter) after exposure to disinfectants grown in biofilms for 72 or 120 h, as indicated.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Killing effect of disinfectant based on biofilm type.
FIG 4
FIG 4
C. difficile vegetative and spore cell counts based on disinfectant and biofilm growth time.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Effect of disinfectants on biomass of biofilms grown for 72 and 120 h.
FIG 6
FIG 6
Visualization of killing effect of disinfectants on monocellular C. difficile biofilm on a surface using light microscopy. PC, positive control; CL, Clorox; SP, Sporox; FM, formalin; NI, Nixall; OPA, ortho-phthalaldehyde; VI, Virex; VO, Vital Oxide.
FIG 7
FIG 7
(A) Visualization of killing effect of disinfectants on a 72-h anaerobic C. difficile biofilm on a surface using confocal microscopy. (B) Visualization of killing effect of disinfectants on a 72-h aerobic multispecies C. difficile biofilm on a surface using confocal microscopy.

References

    1. Lessa FC, Mu Y, Bamberg WM, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati GK, Dunn JR, Farley MM, Holzbauer SM, Meek JI, Phipps EC, Wilson LE, Winston LG, Cohen JA, Limbago BM, Fridkin SK, Gerding DN, McDonald LC. 2015. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 372:825–834. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408913. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rashid T, Vonville H, Hasan I, Garey K. 2017. Mechanisms for floor surfaces or environmental ground contamination to cause human infection: a systematic review. Epidemiol Infect 145:347–357. doi:10.1017/S0950268816002193. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kenters N, Huijskens E, de Wit S, Sanders I, van Rosmalen J, Kuijper E, Voss A. 2017. Effectiveness of various cleaning and disinfectant products on Clostridium difficile spores of PCR ribotypes 010, 014 and 027. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 6:54. doi:10.1186/s13756-017-0210-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uwamahoro MC, Massicotte R, Hurtubise Y, Gagné-Bourque F, Mafu AA, Yahia L. 2018. Evaluating the sporicidal activity of disinfectants against Clostridium difficile and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens spores by using the improved methods based on ASTM E2197-11. Front Public Health 6:18. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rutala WA, Gergen MF, Weber DJ. 2012. Efficacy of different cleaning and disinfection methods against Clostridium difficile spores: importance of physical removal versus sporicidal inactivation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33:1255–1258. doi:10.1086/668434. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources