Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Oct;34(10):4429-4435.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07220-z. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

Laparoscopic versus open management of adult intussusception

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Laparoscopic versus open management of adult intussusception

Sze Li Siow et al. Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Laparotomy has been the traditional approach for the treatment of adult intussusception. The aim of the present study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery to those of open surgery in adult patients with intussusception.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of all adult patients with intussusception admitted to our hospital between 2007 and 2017. The patients' characteristics, presentation, operation details, postoperative outcomes and pathology were analyzed. Comparisons were made between the laparoscopic and open surgery procedures performed during the study period.

Results: Seventeen open and 20 laparoscopic-assisted resections were performed. No significant differences were found between the two groups for the following parameters: age (45.3 ± 16.8 vs. 54.9 ± 19.1, p = 0.160); gender (41 vs. 60% males, p = 0.330); American Society of Anesthesiologists score (p = 0.609); history of cardiovascular disease (5.9% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.950), COPD/asthma (0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.950), diabetes (11.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.950), and renal impairment (5.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.486); body mass index (20.6 vs. 21.9, p = 0.433); timing of presentation (p = 1.000); type of intussusception (p = 0.658); type of procedures (p = 0.446); operative time (173.7 ± 45.4 vs. 191.5 ± 43.9, p = 0.329); and length of postoperative stay (6.7 ± 5.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.1 days, p = 0.153). However, the open surgery group had fewer patients with hypertension (17.6% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.009) and demonstrated a delayed oral intake (4.0 ± 1.7 days vs. 2.5 ± 0.7 days, p = 0.010) and a higher comprehensive complication index (11.5 ± 27.1 vs. 0, p = 0.038).

Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach was associated with earlier oral intake and a lower comprehensive complication index. It is a safe and feasible technique that confers the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. It can be considered the preferred surgical option when the surgical expertise is available.

Keywords: Adult intussusception; Invasive strategy; Laparoscopic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM (1997) The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Am J Surg 173:88–94 - DOI
    1. Siow SL, Mahendran HA (2014) A case series of adult intussusception managed laparoscopically. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24:327–331 - DOI
    1. Siow SL, Chea CH, Hashimah AR, Ting SC (2011) Adult intussusception: 5-year experience in Sarawak. Med J Malays 66:199–201
    1. Kim JW, Lee BH, Park SG, Kim BC, Lee S, Lee SJ (2018) Factors predicting malignancy in adult intussusception: an experience in university-affiliated hospitals. Asian J Surg 41:92–97 - DOI
    1. Honjo H, Mike M, Kusanagi H, Kano N (2015) Adult intussusception: a retrospective review. World J Surg 39:134–138 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources