Cross-Linking-Assisted Infection Reduction: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Adjuvant Cross-Linking on Outcomes in Fungal Keratitis
- PMID: 31619359
- PMCID: PMC6982573
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.029
Cross-Linking-Assisted Infection Reduction: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Adjuvant Cross-Linking on Outcomes in Fungal Keratitis
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if there is a benefit to adjuvant corneal crosslinking (CXL) and to compare natamycin versus amphotericin B for filamentous fungal keratitis.
Design: Outcome-masked, 2×2 factorial design, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Participants: Consecutive patients presenting with moderate vision loss from a smear-positive fungal ulcer at Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, India.
Methods: Study eyes were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment combinations using an adaptive randomization protocol. The treatment arms included (1) topical natamycin 5% alone, (2) topical natamycin 5% plus CXL, (3) topical amphotericin B 0.15% alone, and (4) topical amphotericin 0.15% plus CXL.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome of the trial was microbiological cure at 24 hours on repeat culture. Secondary outcomes included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at 3 weeks and 3 months, percentage of study participants with epithelial healing at 3 days, 3 weeks, and 3 months, infiltrate or scar size at 3 weeks and 3 months, 3-day smear and culture, and adverse events.
Results: Those randomized to CXL regardless of medication (topical natamycin or amphotericin) had 1.32-fold increased odds of 24-hour culture positivity, although this was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-3.06; P = 0.51). We were also unable to find a difference in 24-hour culture positivity between those randomized to amphotericin and those randomized to natamycin when evaluating as a group regardless of whether or not they received CXL (coefficient 1.10; 95% CI, 0.47-2.54; P = 0.84). The BSCVA was approximately 0.22 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (2.2 Snellen lines) worse on average at 3 weeks among those receiving CXL regardless of medication (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.40; P = 0.04) and 0.32 logMAR (3.2 Snellen lines) worse visual acuity at 3 months after controlling for baseline visual acuity (95% CI, 0.03-0.54; P = 0.02). There was no difference in infiltrate or scar size, percentage of epithelialized or adverse events when comparing CXL with no CXL or the 2 topical medications.
Conclusions: There appears to be no benefit of adjuvant CXL in the primary treatment of moderate filamentous fungal ulcers, and it may result in decreased visual acuity.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02570321.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Re: Prajna et al.: Cross-Linking-Assisted Infection Reduction (CLAIR): A randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of adjuvant cross-linking on outcomes in fungal keratitis (Ophthalmology. 2020;127:159-166).Ophthalmology. 2020 Aug;127(8):e55-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.032. Ophthalmology. 2020. PMID: 32703392 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2020 Aug;127(8):e56-e57. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.031. Ophthalmology. 2020. PMID: 32703393 No abstract available.
-
Re: Prajna et al.: Cross-Linking-Assisted Infection Reduction: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of adjuvant cross-linking on outcomes in fungal keratitis (Ophthalmology. 2020;127:159-166).Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan;128(1):e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Aug 14. Ophthalmology. 2021. PMID: 32800613 No abstract available.
-
Reply.Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan;128(1):e6-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Ophthalmology. 2021. PMID: 32828552 No abstract available.
-
Re: Prajna et al.: Cross-Linking-Assisted Infection Reduction: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of adjuvant cross-linking on outcomes in fungal keratitis (Ophthalmology. 2020;127:159-166).Ophthalmology. 2021 Jan;128(1):e4-e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 4. Ophthalmology. 2021. PMID: 32896387 No abstract available.
References
-
- Martins SA, Combs JC, Noguera G, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of riboflavin/UVA combination (365 nm) in vitro for bacterial and fungal isolates: a potential new treatment for infectious keratitis. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2008;49(8):3402–3408. - PubMed
-
- Sauer A, Letscher-Bru V, Speeg-Schatz C, et al. In vitro efficacy of antifungal treatment using riboflavin/UV-A (365 nm) combination and amphotericin B. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2010;51(8):3950–3953. - PubMed
-
- Panda A, Krishna SN, Kumar S. Photo-activated riboflavin therapy of refractory corneal ulcers. Cornea. 2012;31(10): 1210–1213. - PubMed
-
- Iseli HP, Thiel MA, Hafezi F, Kampmeier J, Seiler T. Ultraviolet A/riboflavin corneal cross-linking for infectious keratitis associated with corneal melts. Cornea. 2008;27(5):590–594. - PubMed