Identifying High-Impact and Managing Low-Impact Assessment Practices
- PMID: 31619834
- PMCID: PMC6788162
- DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7496
Identifying High-Impact and Managing Low-Impact Assessment Practices
Abstract
Those in pharmacy education who are tasked with assessment may be overwhelmed by deadlines, data collection, and reporting, leaving little time to pause and examine the effectiveness of their efforts. However, assessment practices must be evaluated for their impact, including their ability to answer important questions, use resources effectively, and contribute to meaningful educational change. Often assessments are implemented, but then attention is diverted to another assessment before the data from the former assessment can be fully interpreted or used. To maximize the impact of assessment practices, tough and uncomfortable decisions may need to be made. In this paper, we suggest an approach for examining and making decisions about assessment activities and provide guidance on building high-impact assessment practices, evolving or "sunsetting" low-impact assessment practices, and managing mandated assessment.
Keywords: assessment; curricular assessment; programmatic assessment.
© 2019 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.
Comment in
-
Learning Assessment vs Program Evaluation.Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7938. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7938. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020. PMID: 33012800 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Response to Peeters and Schmunde: Toward More Clarity in the Use of the Terms Assessment and Program Evaluation.Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe8296. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8296. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020. PMID: 33012806 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation Standards and Key Elements for the Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. 2015. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf. Accessed December 11, 2018.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
