Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jun;26(6):784-793.
doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0035. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

Improving HbA1c with Glucose Self-Monitoring in Diabetic Patients with EpxDiabetes, a Phone Call and Text Message-Based Telemedicine Platform: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving HbA1c with Glucose Self-Monitoring in Diabetic Patients with EpxDiabetes, a Phone Call and Text Message-Based Telemedicine Platform: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ran Xu et al. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Background:We conducted a randomized controlled trial of EpxDiabetes, a novel digital health intervention as an adjunct therapy to reduce HbA1c and fasting blood glucose (FBG) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In addition, we examined the effect of social determinants of health on our system.Methods:Sixty-five (n = 65) patients were randomized at a primary care clinic. Self-reported FBG data were collected by EpxDiabetes automated phone calls or text messages. Only intervention group responses were shared with providers, facilitating follow-up and bidirectional communication. ΔHbA1c and ΔFBG were analyzed after 6 months.Results:There was an absolute HbA1c reduction of 0.69% in the intervention group (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.41 to 0.02) and an absolute reduction of 0.03% in the control group (95% CI, -0.88 to 0.82). For those with baseline HbA1c >8%, HbA1c decreased significantly by 1.17% in the intervention group (95% CI, -1.90 to -0.44), and decreased by 0.02% in the control group (95% CI, -0.99 to 0.94). FBG decreased in the intervention group by 21.6 mg/dL (95% CI, -37.56 to -5.639), and increased 13.0 mg/dL in the control group (95% CI, -47.67 to 73.69). Engagement (proportion responding to ≥25% of texts or calls over 4 weeks) was 58% for the intervention group (95% CI, 0.373-0.627) and 48% for the control group (95% CI, 0.296-0.621). Smoking, number of comorbidities, and response rate were significant predictors of ΔHbA1c.Conclusions:EpxDiabetes helps to reduce HbA1c in patients with uncontrolled T2DM and fosters patient-provider communication; it has definite merit as an adjunct therapy in diabetes management. Future work will focus on improving the acceptability of the system and implementation on a larger scale trial.

Keywords: diabetes; digital health; e-health; glycemic control; self-monitoring; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CONSORT diagram. Color images are available online.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
EpxDiabetes intervention design and Alert protocol. Adapted from Peters et al., a concomitant quality improvement trial using EpxDiabetes.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of intervention and control group ΔHbA1c after 6 months.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Distribution of the intervention and control groups across HbA1c values and FBG values from baseline to posttrial. FBG, fasting blood glucose. Color images are available online.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
The average response rates and average engagement rates for each month of intervention. Standard error bars are displayed. *Response rates were significantly different during months 5 and 6. Color images are available online.

References

    1. CDC diabetes. Available at www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-r... (last accessed November30, 2017)
    1. Koro CE, Bowlin SJ, Bourgeois N, Fedder DO. Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: A preliminary report. Diabetes Care 2004;27:17–20 - PubMed
    1. Ali MK, Bullard KM, Saaddine JB, Cowie CC, Imperatore G, Gregg EW. Achievement of Goals in U.S. Diabetes Care, 1999–2010. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1613–1624 - PubMed
    1. Vincze G, Barner JC, Lopez D. Factors associated with adherence to self-monitoring of blood glucose among persons with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2004;30:112–125 - PubMed
    1. Peters RM, Lui M, Patel K, et al. . Improving glycemic control with a standardized text-message and phone-based intervention: A community implementation. JMIR Diabetes 2017;2:e15. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types