Fragile sites, cancer chromosome breakpoints, and oncogenes all cluster in light G bands
- PMID: 3162186
- DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90005-2
Fragile sites, cancer chromosome breakpoints, and oncogenes all cluster in light G bands
Abstract
Fragile sites tend to be bands where breaks occur in cancer chromosome rearrangements that can involve oncogenes. The locations of fragile sites, cancer breakpoints, and oncogenes were therefore charted. All were predominantly in light G bands. Specifically, 78 of 89 (88%) fragile sites were in light G bands including the large group of common fragile sites inducible with aphidicolin (p less than 0.001). Of 61 cancer breakpoints, 50 (82%) were in light bands including translocation breakpoints (p less than 0.001). Thirteen of 14 (93%) oncogenes localized to light bands. The sharing of chromosome bands can stem from a biologically meaningful relationship, as between cancer breakpoints and oncogenes. Joint occupancy of chromosome bands can also reflect independent reasons to be in the same sector of the genome. Thus, fragile sites may well be in light bands because they are associated with active genes. This clearly does not rule out a biologic relationship between specific fragile sites and specific cancer breakpoints.
Similar articles
-
No statistical association between common fragile sites and nonrandom chromosome breakpoints in cancer cells.Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1988 Mar;31(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90004-0. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1988. PMID: 3162194
-
Cancer chromosome breakpoints and common fragile sites induced by aphidicolin.Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1984 Oct;13(2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(84)90060-8. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1984. PMID: 6434179
-
Fragile sites and chromosome breakpoints in constitutional rearrangements I. Amniocentesis.Clin Genet. 1984 Sep;26(3):169-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1984.tb04363.x. Clin Genet. 1984. PMID: 6478636
-
Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements.DNA Repair (Amst). 2006 Sep 8;5(9-10):1126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jun 27. DNA Repair (Amst). 2006. PMID: 16807141 Review.
-
[Significance of inherited fragile sites in the occurrence of chromosome aberrations in tumor cells].Tsitol Genet. 1987 Jul-Aug;21(4):306-10. Tsitol Genet. 1987. PMID: 3314050 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Non-random distribution of gastric cancer susceptible loci on human chromosomes.EXCLI J. 2018 Aug 17;17:802-807. doi: 10.17179/excli2018-1425. eCollection 2018. EXCLI J. 2018. PMID: 30233279 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Role of DNA secondary structures in fragile site breakage along human chromosome 10.Hum Mol Genet. 2013 Apr 1;22(7):1443-56. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds561. Epub 2013 Jan 7. Hum Mol Genet. 2013. PMID: 23297364 Free PMC article.
-
Aphidicolin-inducible common fragile-site expression: results from a population survey of twins.Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Jan;50(1):76-83. Am J Hum Genet. 1992. PMID: 1729897 Free PMC article.
-
Distributions of susceptibility loci of Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis on human chromosomes.EXCLI J. 2014 Jun 24;13:724-7. eCollection 2014. EXCLI J. 2014. PMID: 26417295 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
FREQUENCY AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITES OR LESIONS IN MALES WITH MENTAL RETARDATION: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY.J Tenn Acad Sci. 1998 Jul-Oct;73(3-4):87-99. J Tenn Acad Sci. 1998. PMID: 28163338 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources