Commentary: The Problems of Grouping All Adversity Into a Special Populations Label
- PMID: 31623449
- PMCID: PMC7458415
- DOI: 10.1177/0163278719882738
Commentary: The Problems of Grouping All Adversity Into a Special Populations Label
Abstract
"Special populations" refer to groups of people whose needs are not fully addressed by traditional health services delivery. Greater access to these services, or tailored services, must be provided to reduce inequities in physical and mental health-care systems. Many different groups have been identified as special populations. We comment on controversies regarding the use of the term special populations in health practice and policy. Applicable conceptual issues include intersectionality, unitization, definitional drawbacks, and looping effects. There is a need to make clear the challenges posed by use of this term (e.g., discrimination, workability). An approach that acknowledges the diversity of groups and accommodates them where necessary without discrimination and unequal treatment is needed.
Keywords: discrimination; intersectionality; looping; special populations; unitization.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Abbott D (2013). Nudge, nudge, wink, wink: Love, sex and gay men with intellectual disabilities—A helping hand or a human right? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57, 1079–1087. - PubMed
-
- American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-II) (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
-
- Burkholder DM, & Nash NB (2013). Special populations in health care. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
-
- Collins PH, & Bilge S (2016). Intersectionality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical