Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;48(1):49-55.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12502. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

Long-term variability in artificially and naturally fluoridated water supplies in England

Affiliations

Long-term variability in artificially and naturally fluoridated water supplies in England

Deborah Moore et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To understand the potential impact of exposure misclassification on water fluoridation studies in England, this paper aims to describe the long-term variation in water fluoride concentrations in both artificially and naturally fluoridated water supplies.

Methods: Water fluoridation dose monitoring data were requested from all five English public water suppliers who artificially fluoridate their water, as well as from one water company that supplies naturally fluoridated water. Descriptive statistics were calculated, including annual means, standard deviations, minimum-maximum and absolute and relative frequencies.

Results: Data were made available by two of the five English water companies who supply artificially fluoridated water and one water company that supplies naturally fluoridated water (40 398 individual samples). The data for fluoridated water spanned 18-35 years, whilst the data on naturally fluoridated water spanned 14 years. The artificially fluoridated samples showed wide variation in fluoride dose control, both between different water treatment works and over time. Mean fluoride concentrations in the artificially fluoridated supplies ranged from 0.53 (SD 0.47) to 0.93 (SD 0.22) mg F/L and were within the optimal range of 0.7-1.0 mg F/L in 27.7%-77.8% of samples. The naturally fluoridated supplies had a higher mean fluoride concentration of 1.06 (SD 0.18) and 1.15 (SD 0.16) mg F/L than the artificially fluoridated supplies, with lower variation over time. The naturally fluoridated supplies were above the optimal range in 75.5% and 53% of samples.

Conclusions: Assumptions that populations living in areas with a water fluoridation scheme have received optimally fluoridated water (0.7-1.0 mg F/L) are invalid. To support future research endeavours, as well as to provide 'external control' and facilitation of optimal dosing, it is recommended that a quarterly record of water fluoride concentrations (mean, standard deviation and minimum and maximum) are made available for every water supply in England, in a format that can be mapped against residential postcodes.

Keywords: dental health; fluoridation; health promotion; programme evaluation; public health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Community Water Fluoridation. Fluoridation Statistics. Revised 2016. Published 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/statistics/2014stats.htm. Accessed February 26, 2018.
    1. Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Worthington H, Walsh T, et al. Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:1-274.
    1. British Fluoridation Society. The Extent of Water Fluoridation. One in a Million: The Facts about Water Fluoridation; 2012. http://www.bfsweb.org/onemillion/09OneinaMillion-TheExtentofFluoridation...
    1. Murray JJ, Vernazza CR, Holmes RD. Forty years of national surveys: an overview of children's dental health from 1973-2013. Br Dent J. 2015;219(6):281-285.
    1. Pretty IA, Boothman N, Morris J, et al. Prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in four English cities. Commun Dent Health. 2016;33(April):292-296.

LinkOut - more resources