Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913570.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13570.

Association of Open Approach vs Laparoscopic Approach With Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Colon Surgery

Affiliations

Association of Open Approach vs Laparoscopic Approach With Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Colon Surgery

Daniel A Caroff et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Colon surgery is associated with a high rate of surgical site infection (SSI), and there is an urgent need for strategies to reduce infection rates.

Objective: To assess whether laparoscopic colon surgery is associated with a lower surgical site infection rate than open-approach laparoscopy, especially in patients with medically complex conditions.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used previously validated diagnosis and procedure codes from Medicare beneficiaries who underwent colon surgery from January 1, 2009, to November 30, 2013. Analyses were performed from August 1 to December 31, 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: Outcome measures were SSI events, medical comorbidities, and laparoscopic or open approach procedures.

Results: A total of 229 726 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.3 [9.4] years; 128 499 [55.9%] female) underwent colon procedures. There were 105 144 laparoscopic procedures and 124 582 open procedures. The overall mean SSI rate was 6.2%, varying by surgical procedure from 5.8% to 7.6%. Among the full study population, adjusted model results showed a significant association of laparoscopy with lower odds of SSI (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.41-0.46; P < .001). When stratified by surgical approach, the mean SSI rates were 4.1% (procedure-specific range, 3.9%-5.1%) for the laparoscopic approach and 7.9% (procedure-specific range, 7.4%-10.2%) for the open approach. When stratified by Elixhauser score groups, the mean SSI rates were 6.2% (procedure-specific range, 3.2%-8.7%) for group 1 (0-1 comorbidity), 5.5% (procedure-specific range, 3.6%-11.1%) for group 2 (2 comorbidities), and 6.6% (procedure-specific range, 4.6%-10.6%) for group 3 (3-13 comorbidities). An interaction was also observed between laparoscopic approach and Elixhauser groups, with increased odds of SSI among patients who had 3 to 13 comorbidities present at the time of the procedure (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.32) compared with patient groups with fewer comorbidities. The population attributable fraction of SSIs for use of the open approach was 34.2%. A total of 2317 of 3882 hospitals (59.7%) performed few (0%-10%) or most (>50%) procedures laparoscopically.

Conclusions and relevance: Policy changes that promote surgical education and resources for laparoscopy, especially at low-adoption hospitals, may be associated with reduced colon SSI rates. Support of the development of innovative educational policies may help achieve improvement in patient outcomes and decreased health care use in colon surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Ms Chan and Drs Calderwood, Wick, and Platt reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality during the conduct of the study. Dr Kleinman reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Huang reported leading other clinical studies with Molnlycke, Stryker (Sage Products), Clorox, MEDLINE, and Xttrium in which participating hospitals received free soap or cleaning supplies from these companies as part of the study design. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Percentage of Hospitals Using the Laparoscopic Approach for Colectomy

Comment in

References

    1. Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, et al. . Health care-associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(22):-. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20(11):725-730. doi:10.1086/501572 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003-2012. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb186-Operating-Room-Pro.... Accessed January 1, 2017.
    1. Howard DP, Datta G, Cunnick G, Gatzen C, Huang A. Surgical site infection rate is lower in laparoscopic than open colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(5):423-427. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01817.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiran RP, El-Gazzaz GH, Vogel JD, Remzi FH. Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(2):232-238. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.028 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types