Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 18;14(10):e0224176.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224176. eCollection 2019.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia

Affiliations

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to anthrax and animal care: A case-control study in Georgia

Rita M Traxler et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Anthrax is endemic in Georgia and recent outbreaks prompted a livestock-handler case-control study with a component to evaluate anthrax knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among livestock handlers or owners.

Methods: Cases were handlers of livestock with confirmed animal anthrax from June 2013-May 2015. Handlers of four matched unaffected animals were selected as controls, two from the same village as the case animal ("village control") and two from 3-10 km away ("area control"). Descriptive statistics were reported and conditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the magnitude of the association of cases with specific study KAP factors.

Results: Cases were more likely male, had lower level college education, less animal care experience, and provided more animal care to their cattle. Cases had lower odds of burying a suddenly dead animal compared to all controls (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.32, 95% Confidence interval [CI]:0.12, 0.88) and area controls (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.91). On an 8-point knowledge scale, cases having an animal with anthrax had a 1.31 times greater knowledge score compared to all controls (95% CI: 1.03, 1.67). Cases had higher odds of ever having human anthrax or knowing another person who had anthrax compared to all controls (OR: 4.56, 95% CI: 1.45, 14.30) and area controls (OR: 7.16, 95% CI: 1.52, 33.80).

Discussion: Cases were more knowledgeable of anthrax and had better anthrax prevention practices, but these are likely a result of the case investigation and ring vaccination following the death of their animal.

Conclusions: The findings reveal a low level of knowledge and practices related to anthrax control and prevention, and will guide educational material development to fill these gaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. OIE., WHO, FAO. Anthrax in humans and animals. Geneva, Switzerland: 2008.
    1. Shadomy SV, Smith TL. Zoonosis update. Anthrax. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2008;233(1):63–72. 10.2460/javma.233.1.63 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hundal JS, Sodhi SS, Gupta A, Singh J, Chahal US. Awareness, knowledge, and risks of zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab. Veterinary world. 2016;9(2):186–91 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Opare C, Nsiire A, Awumbilla B, Akanmori BD. Human behavioural factors implicated in outbreaks of human anthrax in the Tamale municipality of northern Ghana. Acta tropica. 2000;76(1):49–52. Epub 2000/07/29. 10.1016/s0001-706x(00)00089-9 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mebratu AT, Hailu Z, Weldearegay YH. A Retrospective Survey and Assessment of Farmers Indigenous Knowledge on Anthrax in and Around Tanqua-Abergelle District, Northern Ethiopia. Academic Journal of Animal Diseases. 2015;4(1):10–6.

Publication types