Can health and health equity be advanced by urban planning strategies designed to advance global competitiveness? Lessons from two Australian case studies
- PMID: 31627079
- DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112594
Can health and health equity be advanced by urban planning strategies designed to advance global competitiveness? Lessons from two Australian case studies
Erratum in
-
Erratum to "Can health and health equity be advanced by urban planning strategies designed to advance global competitiveness? Lessons from two Australian case studies" [Soc. Sci. Med. 242 (2019) 112594].Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;244:112694. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112694. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Soc Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 31791820 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this article is to investigate whether the neo-liberal goal of global economic competitiveness when included alongside image-inspired social goals such as liveability and environmental goals such as sustainability can lead to policies that impact positively on health and health equity. The paper presents an analysis of the content and intent of strategic planning and transport plans from two Australian state governments.
Methods: The analysis was undertaken using a thematic document analysis of each plan and interviews with agents (n = 21) directly involved in the preparation of each document.
Findings: Key strategic documents formulated under a neo-liberal hegemony simultaneously provided and reduced opportunities to promote and advance health. The policies viewed goals like liveability and sustainability as means of enhancing their cities' image in global competition for exogenous capital flows. Although liveability has many definitions, one definition was able to be used in one jurisdiction as an avenue to include a broad array of social determinants of health into urban planning policy. However, a productivity or a narrowly focussed image narrative can undermine the social determinants of health credentials of liveability. Overemphasising immediate city problems like road congestion as mechanisms to enhance global competitiveness can undermine necessary long-term strategies for city planning that are known to improve liveability and human health. Even where liveability is at the fore, there is a high risk of exacerbating spatial inequities through liveability investments for competitive advantage because they tend to flow to parts of cities with the greatest connections to the global economy, not those with the greatest social need.
Conclusions: A neo-liberal-inspired competitive city paradigm provides opportunities for the advancement of health in urban development. However, when driven by the goals of productivity and/or liveability as image enhancement it can potentially exacerbate health inequities.
Keywords: City image; Global competitiveness; Health equity; Health in all policies; Healthy public policy; Healthy urban planning; Liveable cities; Productivity; Strategic planning; Sustainable cities.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Liveability aspirations and realities: Implementation of urban policies designed to create healthy cities in Australia.Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112713. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112713. Epub 2019 Dec 6. Soc Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 31855727
-
What is the meaning of urban liveability for a city in a low-to-middle-income country? Contextualising liveability for Bangkok, Thailand.Global Health. 2019 Jul 30;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0484-8. Global Health. 2019. PMID: 31362751 Free PMC article.
-
Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health.Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jun;111:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 4. Soc Sci Med. 2014. PMID: 24762261 Review.
-
Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities.Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:94-105. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 2. Soc Sci Med. 2019. PMID: 31075753 Review.
-
The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice.Int J Health Geogr. 2019 Jun 11;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0178-8. Int J Health Geogr. 2019. PMID: 31185987 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Will urban scale affect health services inequity? The empirical evidence from cities in China.Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 8;12:1330921. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1330921. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39040863 Free PMC article.
-
Built environment stakeholders' experiences of implementing healthy urban development: an exploratory study.Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):922-936. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2021.1876376. Epub 2021 Jan 22. Cities Health. 2022. PMID: 39483534 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources