Prophylactic Noninvasive Ventilation Versus Conventional Care in Patients After Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

Background: Cardiac surgery can be accompanied by postoperative complications, which are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effect of prophylactic noninvasive ventilation (NIV) after extubation versus conventional pulmonary care on complications after cardiac surgery.

Materials and methods: An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and EMBASE was conducted to find randomized controlled trials which compared the effect of prophylactic NIV with controlled strategies on complications and which were published before April 2018.

Results: Ten studies (1011 patients) were included in the final analysis. The atelectasis rate was 32.6% in the prophylactic-NIV group, which was lower than that in the control group (48.71%). Prophylactic NIV could lower the rate of atelectasis, reintubation, and other respiratory complications (pleural effusion, pneumonia, and hypoxia) (odds ratio = 0.43, 0.33, and 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.88, 0. 13-0.84, 0.27-0.75; P = 0.02, 0.02, and 0.002, respectively). The effect on cardiac and distal organ complications (P = 0.07) and hospital mortality (P = 0.62) might be limited.

Conclusions: Prophylactic NIV is associated with a lower rate of postoperative pulmonary complications. The effect on the other complications and hospital mortality might be limited. Further evidence with randomized controlled trials can discern the benefits.

Keywords: Cardiac surgery; Conventional pulmonary care; Prophylactic noninvasive ventilation.