Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- PMID: 31630130
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105771
Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
Abstract
In a recent article in this journal, Anna Christensen raises an 'Epicurean challenge' to Don Marquis' much-discussed argument for the immorality of abortion. According to Marquis' argument, abortion is pro tanto morally wrong because it deprives the fetus of 'a future like ours'. Drawing on the Epicurean idea that death cannot harm its victim because there is no subject to be harmed, Christensen argues that neither fetuses nor anyone else can be deprived of a future like ours by dying. Thus, Christensen suggests, the moral wrongness of abortion (and other killings) cannot be grounded in the relevant individual's being deprived of a future like ours. In this reply, I argue that on no interpretation of Christensen's Epicurean challenge does it succeed.
Keywords: Abortion; Death; Ethics.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Continuing conversations about abortion and deprivation.J Med Ethics. 2020 Apr;46(4):275-276. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105908. Epub 2019 Dec 13. J Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 31836622
Comment on
-
Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jan;45(1):22-25. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105045. Epub 2018 Nov 14. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30429204
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical