Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;109(7):1338-1345.
doi: 10.1111/apa.15069. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

Survey shows marked variations in approaches to redirection of care for critically ill very preterm infants in 11 countries

Affiliations

Survey shows marked variations in approaches to redirection of care for critically ill very preterm infants in 11 countries

Kjell Helenius et al. Acta Paediatr. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: We surveyed care practices for critically ill very preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes in Neonates (iNeo) to identify differences relevant to outcome comparisons.

Methods: We conducted an online survey on care practices for critically ill very preterm infants and infants with severe intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). The survey was distributed in 2015 to representatives of 390 NICUs in 11 countries. Survey replies were compared with network incidence of death and severe ICH for infants born between 230/7 and 286/7 weeks of gestation from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015.

Results: Most units in Israel, Japan and Tuscany, Italy, favoured withholding care when care was considered futile, whereas most units in other networks favoured redirection of care. For infants with bilateral grade 4 ICH, redirection of care was very frequently (≥90% of cases) offered in the majority of units in Australia and New Zealand and Switzerland, but rarely in other networks. Networks where redirection of care was frequently offered for severe ICH had lower rates of survivors with severe ICH.

Conclusion: We identified marked inter-network differences in care approaches that need to be considered when comparing outcomes.

Keywords: international survey; neonatal intensive care; redirection of care; severe intracranial haemorrhage; very preterm infant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA. 2015;314:1039-1051.
    1. Mukerji A, Shah V, Shah PS, et al. Periventricular/intraventricular hemorrhage and neurodevelopmental outcomes: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;136:1132-1143.
    1. Lam HS, Wong SPS, Liu FYB, Wong HL, Fok TF, Ng PC. Attitudes toward neonatal intensive care treatment of preterm infants with a high risk of developing long-term disabilities. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1501-1508.
    1. Hendriks MJ, Klein SD, Bucher HU, Baumann-Hölzle R, Streuli JC, Fauchère J-C. Attitudes towards decisions about extremely premature infants differed between Swiss linguistic regions in population-based study. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106:423-429.
    1. Lantos JD. Ethical problems in decision making in the neonatal ICU. Longo DL, editor. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1851-1860.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources