Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 8:10:153-172.
doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S190565. eCollection 2019.

Bracing In The Treatment Of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evidence To Date

Affiliations

Bracing In The Treatment Of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evidence To Date

Nikos Karavidas. Adolesc Health Med Ther. .

Abstract

Brace effectiveness for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was controversial until recent studies provided high quality of evidence that bracing can decrease likelihood of progression and need for operative treatment. Very low evidence exists regarding bracing over 40ο and adult degenerative scoliosis. Initial in-brace correction and compliance seem to be the most important predictive factors for successful treatment outcome. However, the amount of correction and adherence to wearing hours have not been established yet. Moderate evidence suggests that thoracic and double curves, and curves over 30ο at an early growth stage have more risk for failure. High and low body mass index scores are also associated with low successful rates. CAD/CAM braces have shown better initial correction and are more comfortable than conventional plaster cast braces. For a curve at high risk of progression, rigid and day-time braces are significantly more effective than soft or night-time braces. No safe conclusion on effectiveness can be drawn while comparing symmetrical and asymmetrical brace designs. The addition of physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises in brace treatment can provide better outcomes and is recommended, when possible. Despite the growing evidence for brace effectiveness, there is still an imperative need for future high methodological quality studies to be conducted.

Keywords: brace; evidence; non-operative treatment; orthosis; scoliosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
In-brace correction is the most important predictive factor for successful brace treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A rigid brace on the left side and a soft brace on the right side of the photo.
Figure 3
Figure 3
An asymmetric brace on the left side and a symmetric brace on the right side of the photo.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises.

References

    1. Negrini S, Hresko T, O’Brien J, Price N; SOSORT Boards and SRS Non-Operative Committee. Recommendations for research studies on treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: consensus 2014 between SOSORT and SRS non-operative management committee. Scoliosis. 2015;10:8. doi:10.1186/s13013-014-0025-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa A, et al. SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2016;2018(13):3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lonstein JE, Carlson JM. The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(7):1061–1071. - PubMed
    1. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, et al. Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;18(6):CD006850. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinstein S, Dolan L, Wright J, Dobbs M. Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1512–1521. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1307337 - DOI - PMC - PubMed