Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery
- PMID: 31632885
- PMCID: PMC6797017
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5440
Infections in Deep Brain Stimulator Surgery
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation has emerged as an effective treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor with estimates of >100,000 deep brain stimulators (DBSs) implanted worldwide since 1980s. Infections rates vary widely in the literature with rates as high as 25%. Traditional management of infection after deep brain stimulation is systemic antibiotic therapy with wound incision and debridement (I&D) and removal of implanted DBS hardware. The aim of this study is to evaluate the infections occurring after DBS placement and implantable generator (IPG) placement in order to better prevent and manage these infections.
Materials/methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 203 patients who underwent implantation of a DBS at a single institution. For initial electrode placement, patients underwent either unilateral or bilateral electrode placement with implantation of the IPG at the same surgery and IPG replacements occurred as necessary. For patients with unilateral electrodes, repeat surgery for placement of contralateral electrode was performed when desired. Preoperative preparation with ethyl alcohol occurred in all patients while use of intra-operative vancomycin powder was surgeon dependent. All patients received 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Primary endpoint was surgical wound infection or brain abscess located near the surgically implanted DBS leads. Infections were classified as early (<90 days) or late (>90 days). Infectious organisms were recorded based on intra-operative wound cultures. Number of lead implantations, IPG replacements and choice of presurgical, intra-operative, and postsurgical antibiotics were recorded and outcomes compared.
Results: Two hundred and three patients underwent 391 electrode insertions and 244 IPG replacements. Fourteen patients developed an infection (10 early versus 4 late); 12 after implantation surgery (3%) and 2 after IPG replacement surgery (0.8%). No intracranial abscesses were found. Most common sites were the chest and connector. Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most common organism. Intra-operative vancomycin powder did not decrease infection risk. Vancomycin powder use was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery (Relative Risk 5.5080, p = 0.02063). Complete hardware removal occurred in eight patients, one patient had electrode only removal, three patients with I&D and no removal of hardware, and two patients with removal of IPG and extensor cables only. All patients were treated with postoperative intravenous antibiotics and no recurrent infections were found in patients with hardware left in place.
Discussion/conclusion: Infections after DBS implantation and IPG replacement occurred in 3% and 0.8% of patients respectively in our study which is lower than reported historically. Early infections were more common. No intracranial infections were found. Intra-operative use of vancomycin was not shown to decrease risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery or IPG replacement. However, in our study it was shown to increase risk of infection after electrode implantation surgery. Treatment includes antibiotic therapy and debridement with or without removal of hardware. DBS hardware can be safely left in place in select patients who may have significant adverse effects if it is removed.
Keywords: dbs; deep brain stimulator infection.
Copyright © 2019, Bernstein et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Use of Topical Vancomycin Powder to Reduce Surgical Site Infections after Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: UCSF Experience and Meta-Analysis.Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2022;100(2):130-139. doi: 10.1159/000520197. Epub 2021 Nov 26. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 34839296 Free PMC article.
-
Management of device-related wound complications in deep brain stimulation surgery.J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1324-32. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.JNS111798. Epub 2012 Mar 9. J Neurosurg. 2012. PMID: 22404671
-
Reduced long-term cost and increased patient satisfaction with rechargeable implantable pulse generators for deep brain stimulation.J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 28;131(3):799-806. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS172995. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 30265199
-
The incidence of deep brain stimulator hardware infection: the effect of change in antibiotic prophylaxis regimen and review of the literature.Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Oct;25(5):625-31. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.566384. Epub 2011 Apr 18. Br J Neurosurg. 2011. PMID: 21501065 Review.
-
Surgical Site Infections Associated With Implanted Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Neuromodulation. 2023 Feb;26(2):280-291. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Aug 13. Neuromodulation. 2023. PMID: 35970765
Cited by
-
Use of Topical Vancomycin Powder to Reduce Surgical Site Infections after Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: UCSF Experience and Meta-Analysis.Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2022;100(2):130-139. doi: 10.1159/000520197. Epub 2021 Nov 26. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 34839296 Free PMC article.
-
Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis tremor successfully controlled post-ventral intermediate nucleus-deep brain stimulation: a case report.Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1243379. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1243379. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 37712087 Free PMC article.
-
An Unusual Presentation of Peri-Lead Edema Following Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clin Case Rep. 2025 Mar 6;13(3):e70221. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70221. eCollection 2025 Mar. Clin Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40062311 Free PMC article.
-
Rescuing Infected Deep Brain Stimulation Therapies in Severely Affected Patients.Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 28;13(12):1650. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13121650. Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 38137098 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention and Treatment of Hardware-Related Infections in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgeries: A Retrospective and Historical Controlled Study.Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Aug 26;15:707816. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.707816. eCollection 2021. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34512294 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Deep brain stimulation: current and future perspectives. Awan NR, Lozano A, Hamani C. Neurosurg Focus. 2009;27:1–8. - PubMed
-
- Deep brain stimulation hardware-related infections: 10 year experience at a single instituition. [Dec;2018 ];Abode-Lyamah K, Chiang HY, Woodroffe RW, et al. https://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2017.9.JNS1780 J Neurosurg. 2018 March:1–10. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Management of device-related wound complicatios in deep brain stimulation surgery. Fenoy A, Simpson R. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:1324–1332. - PubMed
-
- Maintained deep brain stimulation for severe dystonia despite infection by using externalized electrodes and extracorporeal pulse generator. Hyam JA, Pennington N, Joint C, et al. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:630–633. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous