Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 30:9:980.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00980. eCollection 2019.

Radiomics Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Radiomics Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer

Jia Liu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether a combination of radiomics and automatic machine learning applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of primary breast cancer can non-invasively predict axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. Methods: 62 patients who received a DCE-MRI breast scan were enrolled. Tumor resection and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy were performed within 1 week after the DCE-MRI examination. According to the time signal intensity curve, the volumes of interest (VOIs) were delineated on the whole tumor in the images with the strongest enhanced phase. Datasets were randomly divided into two sets including a training set (~80%) and a validation set (~20%). A total of 1,409 quantitative imaging features were extracted from each VOI. The select K best and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) were used to obtain the optimal features. Three classification models based on the logistic regression (LR), XGboost, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were constructed. Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis was used to analyze the prediction performance of the models. Both feature selection and models construction were firstly performed in the training set, then were further tested in the validation set by the same thresholds. Results: There is no significant difference between all clinical and pathological variables in breast cancer patients with and without SLN metastasis (P > 0.05), except histological grade (P = 0.03). Six features were obtained as optimal features for models construction. In the validation set, with respect to the accuracy and MSE, the SVM demonstrated the highest performance, with an accuracy, AUC, sensitivity (for positive SLN), specificity (for positive SLN) and Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.85, 0.83, 0.71, 1, 0.26, respectively. Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of combining artificial intelligence and radiomics from DCE-MRI of primary tumors to predict axillary SLN metastasis in breast cancer. This non-invasive approach could be very promising in application.

Keywords: DCE-MRI; automatic machine learning; breast cancer; radiomics; sentinel lymph node metastasis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radiomics workflow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lasso algorithm for feature selection. The Lasso path (A) showed coefficient profiles along the full path of possible values for radiomic features. The optimal α value of 0.27 with -log(a) = 1.31 was selected. The MSE path (B) showed that the dotted vertical line was plotted at the value selected using 10-fold cross-validation in (A). The coefficients in the Lasso model (C) resulted in 6 features corresponding to the selected optimal values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves of the XGboost (A), LR (B), and SVM (C) classifiers in training set. ROC curves of the XGboost (D), LR (E), and SVM (F) classifiers in validation set.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Freddie B, Siegel RL, Jacques F, Joannie LT, Ahmedin J. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. (2015) 65:87–108. 10.3322/caac.21262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qiu PF, Liu JJ, Wang YS, Yang GR, Liu YB, Sun X, et al. . Risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis and validation study of the MSKCC nomogram in breast cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. (2012) 42:1002–7. 10.1093/jjco/hys150 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coutant C, Olivier C, Lambaudie E, Fondrinier E, Marchal F, Guillemin F, et al. . Comparison of models to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. (2009) 27:2800–8. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.7418 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kootstra J, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, Rietman H, Vries JD, Baas P, Geertzen JHB, et al. . Quality of life after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in stage I/II breast cancer patients: a prospective longitudinal study. Ann Surg Oncol. (2008) 15:2533–41. 10.1245/s10434-008-9996-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuhl C, Schild H. Dynamic image interpretation of MRI of the breast. J Magn Resonance Imag. (2000) 12:965–74. 10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<965::AID-JMRI23>3.0.CO;2-1 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources