Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;33(6):218-221.
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000905.

Wearable Technology in Spine Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Wearable Technology in Spine Surgery

Thomas J Lee et al. Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide valuable insight into the effectiveness of spine surgery, there still remain limitations on measuring outcomes in this manner. Among other deficiencies, PROMs do not always correlate with more objective measures of surgery success. Wearable technology, such as pedometers, tri-axis accelerometer, or wearable cameras, may allow physicians to track patient progress following spine surgery more objectively. Recently, there has been an emphasis on using wearable devices to measure physical activity and limb and spine function. Wearable devices could play an important role as a supplement to PROMs, although they might have to be substantiated through adequate controlled studies to identify normative data for patients presenting with common spine disorders. This review will detail the current state of wearable technology applications in spine surgery and its direction as its utilization expands.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rao PJ, Phan K, Maharaj MM, et al. Accelerometers for objective evaluation of physical activity following spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;26:14–18.
    1. Ra IH, Min WK. Radiographic and clinical assessment of a freehand lateral mass screw fixation technique: is it always safe in subaxial cervical spine? Spine J. 2014;14:2224–2230.
    1. Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(suppl):S54–S68.
    1. Dunn AS, Passmore SR, Burke J, et al. A cross-sectional analysis of clinical outcomes following chiropractic care in veterans with and without post-traumatic stress disorder. Mil Med. 2009;174:578–583.
    1. Johnston BC, Patrick DL, Busse JW, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in meta-analyses—part 1: assessing risk of bias and combining outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:109.

LinkOut - more resources