Functional Results and Outcomes After Repair of Partial Proximal Hamstring Avulsions at Midterm Follow-up
- PMID: 31634433
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546519879117
Functional Results and Outcomes After Repair of Partial Proximal Hamstring Avulsions at Midterm Follow-up
Abstract
Background: Partial avulsions of the proximal hamstring origin remain a challenging problem with nonoperative treatments frequently providing limited success. The literature is limited regarding the outcomes of operative management in the active and athletic population.
Hypothesis: Surgical fixation of proximal hamstring ruptures will have favorable outcomes at midterm follow-up.
Study design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods: A total of 64 patients with partial avulsions of the proximal hamstring origin treated with surgical fixation by a single surgeon were reviewed at a 2-year minimum follow-up. All patients had initially undergone failed nonoperative treatment. Patient-reported outcome scores on the Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Marx Activity Rating Scale, custom LEFS and Marx scales, and total proximal hamstring score were evaluated. Data on patient-perceived strength, return to sport, and satisfaction were also collected.
Results: The cohort included 27 male and 37 female (N = 64) patients with a mean age of 47.3 years (range, 16-65 years), and all were reviewed at a mean 6.5-year (range, 2-12.5 years) follow-up. The average postoperative LEFS was 96% (range, 68%-100%), with the custom LEFS being 90% (range, 39%-100%). The mean Marx score was 12.4 (range, 4-16). The Marx custom score demonstrated no disability with activities of daily living. The mean total proximal hamstring score was 94% (range, 69%-100%). No differences in any outcome measures were seen when comparing acute versus chronic repairs. Three patients underwent further hamstring surgery. No patients reported symptoms of numbness in the operative extremity at rest, while 3 patients had a superficial stitch abscess treated with antibiotics alone. The most commonly reported difficulty was with prolonged sitting. Ninety-seven percent were satisfied with surgery, 92% reported they could participate in strenuous activity, and 97% estimated their strength to be >75%, while 64% estimated it to be 100% of their contralateral side. Patients returned to sport at an average of 11.1 months, and all that returned were satisfied with their performance.
Conclusion: Both early and delayed anatomic surgical repair of partial proximal hamstring avulsions leads to successful functional outcomes, a high rate of return to athletic activity, and low complication rates at the 6.5-year follow-up. Nonoperative treatments should first be attempted.
Keywords: hamstring; partial hamstring rupture; proximal hamstring; proximal hamstring repair.
Similar articles
-
Operative management of partial-thickness tears of the proximal hamstring muscles in athletes.Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1363-71. doi: 10.1177/0363546513482717. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Am J Sports Med. 2013. PMID: 23576684
-
Long-term Outcomes of Partial Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Repair: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2025 Jul;53(8):1885-1892. doi: 10.1177/03635465251338078. Epub 2025 May 15. Am J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40371751
-
Functional results and outcomes after repair of proximal hamstring avulsions.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2092-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546512456012. Epub 2012 Aug 17. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22904210
-
Outcomes After Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2798-2808. doi: 10.1177/0363546517732526. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29016194
-
Treatment of proximal hamstring ruptures - a systematic review.Int J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;32(7):490-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273753. Epub 2011 May 11. Int J Sports Med. 2011. PMID: 21563032
Cited by
-
Modified surgical anchor refixation in older patients with acute proximal hamstring rupture: clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and muscle strength.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4679-4688. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04752-3. Epub 2023 Jan 9. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36622424 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Clinical results after refixation of proximal hamstring tendon ruptures comparing different anchor systems].Unfallchirurg. 2021 Jul;124(7):560-567. doi: 10.1007/s00113-021-01020-8. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Unfallchirurg. 2021. PMID: 34143256 German.
-
Influence of Workers' Compensation Status on Functional Recovery and Return to Work After Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Surgery: A Matched Cohort Study.Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Feb 27;13(2):23259671251316218. doi: 10.1177/23259671251316218. eCollection 2025 Feb. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40066072 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Proximal Hamstring Tendon Repair With Knotless Suture-Bridge Technique.Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Sep 11;12(10):e1737-e1745. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.05.024. eCollection 2023 Oct. Arthrosc Tech. 2023. PMID: 37942091 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Bracing After Proximal Hamstring Repair.Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Feb 23;12(2):23259671241230045. doi: 10.1177/23259671241230045. eCollection 2024 Feb. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 38405008 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources