Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct 20;55(10):703.
doi: 10.3390/medicina55100703.

Body of Evidence in Favor of Adopting 130/80 mm Hg as New Blood Pressure Cut-Off for All the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Affiliations
Review

Body of Evidence in Favor of Adopting 130/80 mm Hg as New Blood Pressure Cut-Off for All the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Giovanni Sisti et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) updated its guideline redefining the classification of hypertension and the blood pressure cut-off in 2017. The current cut-offs for stage 1 hypertension of 130 mm Hg systolic blood pressure or 80 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure replace the previous cut-offs of 140 mm Hg systolic blood pressure or 90 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure which were based on the ACC/AHA guidelines from 1988. However, the blood pressure cut-off for the obstetric population still remains as 140/90 mm Hg despite the scarcity of evidence for it. Recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) bulletins for pregnant women have not reflected the new ACC/AHA change of guideline. We reviewed a mounting body of evidence prompting the implementation of the new ACC/AHA guidelines for the obstetric population. These studies examined maternal and fetal outcomes applying the new ACC/AHA guidelines during antepartum or postpartum care.

Keywords: blood pressure cut-off; eclampsia; gestational hypertension; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; preeclampsia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 203: Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;133:e26–e50. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;133:e1–e25. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Umesawa M., Kobashi G. Epidemiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: Prevalence, risk factors, predictors and prognosis. Hypertens Res. 2017;40:213–220. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.126. - DOI - PubMed
    1. English F.A., Kenny L.C., McCarthy F.P. Risk factors and effective management of preeclampsia. Integr. Blood Press. Control. 2015;8:7–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lal A.K., Gao W., Hibbard J.U. Eclampsia: Maternal and neonatal outcomes. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2013;3:186–190. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2013.04.013. - DOI - PubMed