Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;11(5):580-584.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00336.1.

Association of Doximity Ranking and Residency Program Characteristics Across 16 Specialty Training Programs

Association of Doximity Ranking and Residency Program Characteristics Across 16 Specialty Training Programs

Max M Feinstein et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Residency program prestige is an important variable medical students consider when creating their rank list. Doximity Residency Navigator is a ranking system that previous reports have shown significantly influences medical student application decisions. Doximity's use of peer nomination as a central component of its methodology for determining program rank has drawn criticism for its lack of objectivity. Doximity has not published information regarding how peer nomination and more objective measures are statistically weighted in reputation calculation.

Objective: This study assesses whether a strong negative correlation exists between residency program size and Doximity ranking.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of Doximity residency rankings from the 2018-2019 academic year was conducted. Data extracted from Doximity included program rank, size, and age. Data were additionally collected from the Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, funding in 2018 and the US News & World Report Best Medical Schools 2019-2020. A multivariable linear regression model was used that included Doximity ranking as the outcome variable and residency program size as the predictor variable with adjustment for the aforementioned variables.

Results: Sixteen of the 28 specialties on Doximity were included in the analysis, representing 3388 unique residency programs. After adjustment for covariates, residency program size was a significant predictor of Doximity ranking (β = -1.84; 95% CI -2.01 to -1.66, P < .001).

Conclusions: These findings support the critique that the Doximity reputation ranking system may favor larger residency programs. More transparency for Doximity reputation ranking algorithm is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Parameter Estimates (Beta) for Relationship Between Residency Program Size and Doximity Ranking by Specialty, Adjusted for Program Age, NIH Funding, and Association with USNWR-Ranked Medical School Abbreviations: Phys. Med. & Rehab, physical medicine and rehabilitation; USNWR, US News & World Report. Note: The negative value of the beta for the program size relationship indicates that a larger residency program correlates with a lower (ie, improved) rank number. Parameter estimates (beta) are from individual multivariable linear regression models for each specialty. The error bars represent the 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. National Resident Matching Program. Charting Outcomes in the Match: U.S. Allopathic Seniors. 2019 https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Charting-Outcomes-in-the... Accessed August 26.
    1. Davydow D, Bienvenu OJ, Lipsey J, Swartz K. Factors influencing the choice of a psychiatric residency program: a survey of applicants to the Johns Hopkins residency program in psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2008;32(2):143–146. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.32.2.143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker AM, Petroze RT, Schirmer BD, Calland JF. Surgical residency market research-what are applicants looking for. J Surg Educ. 2013;70(2):232–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.09.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Svider PF, Gupta A, Johnson AP, Zuliani G, Shkoukani MA, Eloy JA, et al. Evaluation of otolaryngology residency program websites. JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2014;140(10):956–960. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1714. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atashroo D, Luan A, Vyas K, Zielins ER, Maan Z, Duscher D, et al. What makes a plastic surgery residency program attractive? An applicant's perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(1):189–196. - PubMed