Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Sep 20:10:183.
doi: 10.25259/SNI_431_2019. eCollection 2019.

Cervical instability following artificial disc replacement

Affiliations
Case Reports

Cervical instability following artificial disc replacement

Ki Joon Kim et al. Surg Neurol Int. .

Abstract

Background: Although there has been increased interest in utilizing artificial disc replacement (ADR) techniques to treat cervical degenerative disease, few reports have focused on their postoperative complication and reoperation rates.

Case description: A 52-year-old male underwent the uneventful placement of a C5-C6 cervical ADR for disc disease and foraminal stenosis. One year later, he experienced the onset of severe neck pain attributed to instability of the ADR construct. This required removal of the C5-6 ADR and subsequent fusion.

Conclusion: Strict adherence to appropriate criteria is critical for choosing when to place a cervical ADR. This requires documenting; adequate surgical indications, careful selection of the appropriate ADR device, meticulous surgical technique, proper preservation of the supporting structures, and sufficient neural decompression.

Keywords: Artificial disc replacement; Cervical instability; Fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
(a) The magnetic resonance imaging showed a herniated intervertebral disc (arrow), foraminal stenosis at C5-6 left. (b) The computed tomography showed a foraminal stenosis (arrow) at C5-6 left. (c) The flexion view, (d) The extension view showed disc space narrowing and bony spur at C5-6.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
(a) Postoperative – 1 week, (b) Postoperative – 1 week, (c) Postoperative – 2 months, (d) Postoperative – 2 months, (e) Postoperative – 14 months, (f) Postoperative - 14 months showed an aggravation of cervical instability at C5-6. Cervical instability at C5-6, the ADR site, aggravated in the temporal order of (a-f). (g) Radiograph obtained after a revision operation, in which the ADR implant was removed and ACDF was performed.

References

    1. Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Mummaneni PV. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the prestige disc: Results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:308–18. - PubMed
    1. Kerferd JW, Abi-Hanna D, Phan K, Rao P, Mobbs RJ. Focal hypermobility observed in cervical arthroplasty with mobi-C. J Spine Surg. 2017;3:693–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kowalczyk I, Lazaro BC, Fink M, Rabin D, Duggal N. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, proDisc-C, and prestige LP disc. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:630–5. - PubMed
    1. Park SB, Kim KJ, Jin YJ, Kim HJ, Jahng TA, Chung CK, et al. X-ray-based kinematic analysis of cervical spine according to prosthesis designs: Analysis of the mobi C, bryan, PCM, and prestige LP. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:E291–7. - PubMed
    1. Salari B, McAfee PC. Cervical total disk replacement: Complications and avoidance. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43:97–107. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources