Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):737.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4574-3.

Algorithms to identify COPD in health systems with and without access to ICD coding: a systematic review

Holger Gothe  1   2 , Sasa Rajsic  3 , Djurdja Vukicevic  3 , Tonio Schoenfelder  4 , Beate Jahn  3 , Sabine Geiger-Gritsch  3 , Diana Brixner  5 , Niki Popper  3   6   7 , Gottfried Endel  8 , Uwe Siebert  3   9   10   11
Affiliations

Algorithms to identify COPD in health systems with and without access to ICD coding: a systematic review

Holger Gothe et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Estimation of incidence, prevalence and disease burden through routine insurance data is challenging because of under-diagnosis and under-treatment, particularly for early stage disease in health care systems where outpatient International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnoses are not collected. This poses the question of which criteria are commonly applied to identify COPD patients in claims datasets in the absence of ICD diagnoses, and which information can be used as a substitute. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize previously reported methodological approaches for the identification of COPD patients through routine data and to compile potential criteria for the identification of COPD patients if ICD codes are not available.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed in Medline via PubMed and Google Scholar from January 2000 through October 2018, followed by a manual review of the included studies by at least two independent raters. Study characteristics and all identifying criteria used in the studies were systematically extracted from the publications, categorized, and compiled in evidence tables.

Results: In total, the systematic search yielded 151 publications. After title and abstract screening, 38 publications were included into the systematic assessment. In these studies, the most frequently used (22/38) criteria set to identify COPD patients included ICD codes, hospitalization, and ambulatory visits. Only four out of 38 studies used methods other than ICD coding. In a significant proportion of studies, the age range of the target population (33/38) and hospitalization (30/38) were provided. Ambulatory data were included in 24, physician claims in 22, and pharmaceutical data in 18 studies. Only five studies used spirometry, two used surgery and one used oxygen therapy.

Conclusions: A variety of different criteria is used for the identification of COPD from routine data. The most promising criteria set in data environments where ambulatory diagnosis codes are lacking is the consideration of additional illness-related information with special attention to pharmacotherapy data. Further health services research should focus on the application of more systematic internal and/or external validation approaches.

Keywords: Administrative data; COPD; Case finding; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Claims data; Epidemiology; ICD code; Incidence; Patient identification; Prevalence; Routine data; Secondary data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart reporting the inclusion/exclusion of publications into/from the review
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Criteria used for identification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease across included studies
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma JT. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - Fact sheet http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-p.... Accessed 25 May 2017.
    1. Global Health Estimates 2016 . Deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
    1. Jones RC, Price D, Ryan D, Sims EJ, von Ziegenweidt J, Mascarenhas L, Burden A, Halpin DM, Winter R, Hill S, et al. Opportunities to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in routine care in the UK: a retrospective study of a clinical cohort. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(4):267–276. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70008-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Department of Health / Medical Directorate / Respiratory Team. An outcomes strategy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. In. Edited by Health Do. London: Department of Health; 2011. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa....

Publication types