Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2019;23(9):771-787.
doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1273-z.

Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management

E Dent et al. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019.

Abstract

Objective: The task force of the International Conference of Frailty and Sarcopenia Research (ICFSR) developed these clinical practice guidelines to overview the current evidence-base and to provide recommendations for the identification and management of frailty in older adults.

Methods: These recommendations were formed using the GRADE approach, which ranked the strength and certainty (quality) of the supporting evidence behind each recommendation. Where the evidence-base was limited or of low quality, Consensus Based Recommendations (CBRs) were formulated. The recommendations focus on the clinical and practical aspects of care for older people with frailty, and promote person-centred care. Recommendations for Screening and Assessment: The task force recommends that health practitioners case identify/screen all older adults for frailty using a validated instrument suitable for the specific setting or context (strong recommendation). Ideally, the screening instrument should exclude disability as part of the screening process. For individuals screened as positive for frailty, a more comprehensive clinical assessment should be performed to identify signs and underlying mechanisms of frailty (strong recommendation). Recommendations for Management: A comprehensive care plan for frailty should address polypharmacy (whether rational or nonrational), the management of sarcopenia, the treatable causes of weight loss, and the causes of exhaustion (depression, anaemia, hypotension, hypothyroidism, and B12 deficiency) (strong recommendation). All persons with frailty should receive social support as needed to address unmet needs and encourage adherence to a comprehensive care plan (strong recommendation). First-line therapy for the management of frailty should include a multi-component physical activity programme with a resistance-based training component (strong recommendation). Protein/caloric supplementation is recommended when weight loss or undernutrition are present (conditional recommendation). No recommendation was given for systematic additional therapies such as cognitive therapy, problem-solving therapy, vitamin D supplementation, and hormone-based treatment. Pharmacological treatment as presently available is not recommended therapy for the treatment of frailty.

Keywords: 80 and over; Aged; Frailty/diagnosis; Frailty/therapy; Patient Care Planning/standards; Practice guideline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E. Dent, J.E. Morley, A.J. Cruz-Jentoft, L. Rodríguez-Mañas, L.P. Fried, J. Woo, I. Aprahamian, A. Sanford, J. Lundy, J. Beilby, F.C. Martin, L. Ferrucci, R.A. Merchant, H. Arai, E.O. Hoogendijk, C.W. Won, A. Abbatecola, T. Cederholm, T. Strandberg, L.M. Gutiérrez Robledo, L. Flicker, M. Aubertin-Leheudre, H.A. Bischoff-Ferrari, J.M. Guralnik, J. Muscedere, M. Pahor, A.M. Negm, D.L. Waters declare there are no conflicts. L. Woodhouse reports personal fees from American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), personal fees from Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes (FOTO) Inc., personal fees from Canadian Physiotherapy Association (CPA), personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Scholar Rock, outside the submitted work. J.M. Bauer reports personal fees from Fresenius, personal fees from Nestlé, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Nutricia DANONE, outside the submitted work. J Ruiz: employees Longeveron. S. Bhasin reports grants from AbbVie, grants from Alivegen, grants from MIB, other from FPT, other from AbbVie, outside the submitted work. J.Y. Reginster reports grants and personal fees from IBSA-GENEVRIER, grants and personal fees from MYLAN, grants and personal fees from RADIUS HEALTH, personal fees from PIERRE FABRE, grants from CNIEL, personal fees from DAIRY RESEARCH COUNCIL (DRC), outside the submitted work. B. Vellas reports grants from Nestle, Nutricia, Novartis outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The cascade of functional decline in older adults from independence, through to frailty and disability (in the absence of intervention) [Based on concepts and findings by Dapp et al. (34) Hoogendijk et al. (35), Clegg et al. (36) and Fried et al. (37)]

References

    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926. PubMed PMID: 18436948, PMCID 2335261. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoogendijk EO, Muntinga ME, van Leeuwen KM, van der Horst HE, Deeg DJ, Frijters DH, et al. Self-perceived met and unmet care needs of frail older adults in primary care. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;58(1):37–42. PubMed PMID: 24090711. - PubMed
    1. Chode S, Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Morley JE. Frailty, Diabetes, and Mortality in Middle-Aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(8):854–859. PubMed PMID: 27709235. - PubMed
    1. Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwee D, Habbig AK, Scafoglieri A, Jansen B, et al. Frailty and the Prediction of Negative Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(12):1163–1167. - PubMed
    1. Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(6):392–397. PubMed PMID: 23764209, PMCID 4084863. - PMC - PubMed

Uncited references

    1. Blom JW, Van den Hout WB, Den Elzen WPJ, Drewes YM, Bleijenberg N, Fabbricotti IN, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of proactive and multidisciplinary integrated care for older people with complex problems in general practice: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Age and Ageing. 2018;47(5):705–714. PMCID 6108387.
    1. O’Mahony D, O’Sullivan D, Byrne S, O’Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2015;44(2):213–218. PubMed PMID: 25324330. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types