Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Oct 21:14:42.
doi: 10.1186/s13006-019-0235-8. eCollection 2019.

Counselling interventions to enable women to initiate and continue breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alison McFadden  1 , Lindsay Siebelt  1 , Joyce L Marshall  2 , Anna Gavine  1 , Lisa-Christine Girard  3 , Andrew Symon  1 , Stephen MacGillivray  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Counselling interventions to enable women to initiate and continue breastfeeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alison McFadden et al. Int Breastfeed J. .

Abstract

Background: Many infants worldwide are not breastfeeding according to WHO recommendations and this impacts on the health of women and children. Increasing breastfeeding is identified as a priority area supported by current policy targets. However, interventions are complex and multi-component and it is unclear which elements of interventions are most effective to increase breastfeeding in which settings. Breastfeeding counselling is often part of complex interventions but evidence is lacking on the specific effect of counselling interventions on breastfeeding practices. The aim of this systematic review is to examine evidence on effectiveness of breastfeeding counselling to inform global guidelines.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted of six electronic databases in January 2018. Randomised controlled trials comparing breastfeeding counselling with no breastfeeding counselling or different formulations of counselling were included if they measured breastfeeding practices between birth and 24 months after birth.

Results: From the 5180 records identified in searches and a further 11 records found by hand searching, 63 studies were included. Of these, 48 were individually-randomised trials and 15 were cluster-randomised trials. A total of 69 relevant comparisons were reported involving 33,073 women. There was a significant effect of counselling interventions on any breastfeeding at 4 to 6 weeks (Relative risk [RR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.77, 0.94) and 6 months (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87, 0.94). Greater effects were found on exclusive breastfeeding at 4 to 6 weeks (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72, 0.87) and 6 months (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78, 0.91). Counselling delivered at least four times postnatally is more effective than counselling delivered antenatally only and/or fewer than four times. Evidence was mostly of low quality due to high or unclear risk of bias of the included trials and high heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Breastfeeding counselling is an effective public health intervention to increase rates of any and exclusive breastfeeding. Breastfeeding counselling should be provided face-to-face, and in addition, may be provided by telephone, both antenatally and postnatally, to all pregnant women and mothers with young children. To inform scale-up globally there is a need to further understand the elements of breastfeeding interventions such as counselling and their effectiveness in different contexts and circumstances.

Study registration: This systematic review was registered in Prospero (CRD42018086494).

Keywords: Breastfeeding; Counselling; Intervention; Meta-analysis; Randomised control trial; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of women who stop any breastfeeding before 4–6 weeks postpartum
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of women who stop any breastfeeding before 6 months postpartum
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Number of women who stop exclusive breastfeeding before 4–6 weeks postpartum
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Number of women who stop exclusive breastfeeding before 6 months postpartum
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382(9890):427–451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jones G, Steketee RW, Black RE, Bhutta ZA, Morris SS. Bellagio child survival study group: how many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet. 2003;362(9377):65–71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13811-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horta BL, Loret De Mola C, Victora CG. Long-term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:30–37. doi: 10.1111/apa.13133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Girard L-C, Farkas C. Breastfeeding and behavioural problems: propensity score matching with a national cohort of infants in Chile. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):e025058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025058. - DOI - PMC - PubMed