Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;23(2):133-142.
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12353. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

Effectiveness of clear aligner therapy for orthodontic treatment: A systematic review

Lindsay Robertson  1 , Harsimrat Kaur  1 , Nathalia Carolina Fernandes Fagundes  1 , Dan Romanyk  2 , Paul Major  1 , Carlos Flores Mir  1
Affiliations

Effectiveness of clear aligner therapy for orthodontic treatment: A systematic review

Lindsay Robertson et al. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse through a systematic review the effectiveness of clear aligners by assessing: (a) predictability of clear aligners and (b) treatment outcome comparison of clear aligner therapy with fixed appliance therapy.

Methods: An electronic search was made from January 2014 to April 2019 using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and LILACS databases without any limitations on language. Three reviewers independently assessed the articles. Quality assessment of observational studies and randomized control trial was done by using the ROBINS tool and Cochrane risk of bias tool, respectively. GRADE instrument was used to assess certainty level for each identified outcome.

Results: Seven eligible articles (one randomized controlled trial and six retrospective cohort) were included in our systematic review. Most of the studies (six out of seven) had a moderate risk of bias and one had a high risk of bias.

Conclusions: 'Low to moderate level' of certainty in regard to specific clear aligner therapy tooth movements' efficiency was identified. Clear aligners may produce clinically acceptable outcomes that could be comparable to fixed appliance therapy for buccolingual inclination of upper and lower incisors in mild to moderate malocclusions. However, not all potential clinical scenarios have been assessed in the included studies. Most of the tooth movements may not be predictable enough to be accomplished with only one set of trays with clear aligners despite the recent advances in technology.

Keywords: clear aligner; predictability; systematic review; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ojima K, Kau CH. A perspective in accelerated orthodontics with aligner treatment. Semin Orthod. 2017;23(1):76-82.
    1. Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128(3):292-298.
    1. Giancotti A, Greco M, Mampieri G. Extraction treatment using invisalign technique. Prog Orthod. 2006;7(1):32-43.
    1. Pavoni C, Lione R, Laganà G, Cozza P. Self-ligating versus Invisalign: analysis of dento-alveolar effects. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2011;2(1-2):23-27.
    1. Lagravère MO, Flores-Mir C. The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(12):1724-1729.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources