Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 15;45(6):407-413.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003285.

Clinical Level of Evidence Presented at the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) Annual Meeting Over 10 Years (2008-2017): A Systematic Review

Nicholas W Eyrich  1 , Daniel Liesman  1 , Nicole A Pescatore  2 , Ilyas S Aleem  3   4
Affiliations

Clinical Level of Evidence Presented at the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) Annual Meeting Over 10 Years (2008-2017): A Systematic Review

Nicholas W Eyrich et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review.

Objective: We systematically reviewed the level of clinical evidence presented at Cervical Spine Research Society annual meetings from 2008 through 2017.

Summary of background data: The Cervical Spine Research Society is dedicated to advancing knowledge of the cervical spine to promote evidence-based care. Research presented at these meetings impacts clinical practice.

Methods: A total of 774 paper abstracts presented at Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) annual meetings were independently assessed by two reviewers. Reviewers designated a clinical level of evidence (LOE) to each included abstract from level I to level IV based on criteria set forth by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Reviewer agreement was assessed using Cohens Kappa coefficient (k) and disagreements were discussed until a consensus was reached. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess for differences in LOE grades. Chi-squared testing was used to assess nonrandom changes in level of evidence and in excluded studies.

Results: A total of 583 abstracts were included. Over the last 10 CSRS meetings, 5.15% of presentations were level I, 27.8% level II, 27.4% level III, and 39.6% level IV. The average LOE from 2008 to 2017 was 3.02 (median = 3). Additionally, 49.7% were therapeutic studies, 37.6% prognostic studies, and 12.7% diagnostic studies. When comparing the first 5 years (2008-2012) to the last 5 years (2013-2017), we observed a significant increase in Level II (P = 0.007) evidence and a corresponding decrease in level IV evidence (P < 0.001). The average LOE improved from 3.14 (2008-2012) to 2.91 (2013-2017); there was a significant improvement in LOE between the two periods (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Emphasis on evidence-based medicine within cervical spine research has positively influenced the clinical level of evidence disseminated at CSRS annual meetings between 2008 and 2017. Continued focus on higher quality Level I studies is warranted.

Level of evidence: 4.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. DeVries JG, Berlet GC. Understanding levels of evidence for scientific communication. Foot Ankle Spec 2010; 3:205–209.
    1. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group∗. “The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed December 7, 2018.
    1. Oppenlander ME, Maulucci CM, Ghobrial GM, et al. Research in spinal surgery: Evaluation and practice of evidence-based medicine. World J Orthop 2014; 5:89–93.
    1. Naji F, Javidan AP, Khan S, et al. Level of clinical evidence presented at the Society for Vascular Surgery Annual Meeting during a 5-year period (2012–2016). J Vasc Surg 2018; 67:951–959.
    1. Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chung KC. The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128:305–310.

Publication types

MeSH terms