Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;45(3):176-179.
doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100783. Epub 2019 Oct 25.

Ultrasound-guided L5 dorsal ramus block: validation of a novel technique

Affiliations

Ultrasound-guided L5 dorsal ramus block: validation of a novel technique

John-Paul B Etheridge et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although the value of ultrasound-guided (USG) lumbar medial branch blocks (MBB) has previously been examined in several clinical trials, blocking the L5 dorsal ramus (DR) remains a technical challenge and we sought to examine the accuracy of a novel technique targeting this level.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 115 patients scheduled for an L4 MBB and L5 DR block underwent an ultrasound scan to assess their lower spine sonoanatomy. Subjects in whom the necessary landmarks could be visualized underwent a USG L5 DR block using a pivot technique, which involved redirecting a needle from its position on the L5 transverse process after an L4 MBB. Success was determined by a blinded observer who examined the contrast distribution on postprocedural X-ray images. In addition to the final needle position, performance time, the number of needle passes, and any complication were recorded.

Results: A total of 100 patients had a USG block and 15 patients (13%) were excluded because of poor landmark visibility. The latter group presented a significantly higher body mass index (38.90±7.50 vs 26.31±4.25 kg/m2, p=0.004). A total of five failures were noted (95% success rate), this included three patients with transitional anatomy in whom needles were placed at the wrong level and two cases of incomplete contrast coverage possibly related to the partial intravascular injection. Performance time was 153.93±41.56 s and the median number of needle passes was 2 (range 4). No significant complications were noted.

Conclusion: The pivot technique provides a reliable approach for USG L5 DR ramus blocks.

Trial registration number: NCT03805906.

Keywords: chronic pain: back pain; chronic pain: imaging; interventional pain management; ultrasound in pain medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources