Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Oct 25;21(6):108.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-019-0378-y.

Development of In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation for Upadacitinib Extended-Release Tablet Formulation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Development of In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation for Upadacitinib Extended-Release Tablet Formulation

Mohamed-Eslam F Mohamed et al. AAPS J. .

Abstract

Upadacitinib is a selective Janus Kinase 1 inhibitor which is being developed for the treatment of several inflammatory diseases including rheumatoid arthritis. Upadacitinib was evaluated in Phase 3 studies as an oral extended-release (ER) formulation administered once daily. The purpose of this study was to develop a level A in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for upadacitinib ER formulation. The pharmacokinetics of four upadacitinib extended-release formulations with different in vitro release characteristics and an immediate-release capsule formulation of upadacitinib were evaluated in 20 healthy subjects in a single-dose, randomized, crossover study. In vivo pharmacokinetic data and in vitro dissolution data (USP Dissolution Apparatus 1; pH 6.8; 100 rpm) were used to establish a level A IVIVC. Three formulations were used to establish the IVIVC, and the fourth formulation was used for external validation. A non-linear IVIVC best described the relationship between upadacitinib in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption profiles. The absolute percent prediction errors (%PE) for upadacitinib Cmax and AUC were less than 10% for all three formulations used to establish the IVIVC, as well as for the %PE for the external validation formulation and the overall mean internal validation. Model was cross-validated using the leave-one-out approach; all evaluated cross-validation runs met the regulatory acceptance criteria. A level A IVIVC was successfully developed and validated for upadacitinib ER formulation, which meets the FDA and EMA regulatory validation criteria and can be used as surrogate for in vivo bioequivalence.

Keywords: ABT-494; extended-release formulation; in vitro/in vivo correlations (IVIVC); pharmacokinetics; upadacitinib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors are employees of AbbVie Inc. and may hold AbbVie stocks or options.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cumulative percent dissolved (mean ± SD) versus time profiles for upadacitinib ER formulations containing 10% HPMC (formulation A), 15% HPMC (formulation B), 20% HPMC (formulation C; target formulation), and 35% HPMC (formulation D). F2 values comparing the four formulations are presented
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean upadacitinib plasma concentration versus time profiles following administration of IR capsule and ER tablet formulations of upadacitinib. ER formulations of upadacitinib contained 10% HPMC (formulation A), 15% HPMC (formulation B), 20% HPMC (formulation C; target formulation), and 35% HPMC (formulation D). Insert: Log-linear scale of mean upadacitinib plasma concentration versus time profiles following administration of IR capsule and ER tablet formulations of upadacitinib
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Point Estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the bioavailability of upadacitinib following administration of single doses of upadacitinib 30 mg extended-release tablets with different release rates relative to single 24 mg dose of the upadacitinib immediate-release capsules
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean in vivo absorption versus time profile of upadacitinib extended-release formulations based on numerical deconvolution
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Correlation between a the observed fraction absorbed and the fraction dissolved and b in vivo absorption time and in vitro dissolution time for upadacitinib ER formulations

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parmentier JM, Voss J, Graff C, Schwartz A, Argiriadi M, Friedman M, Camp HS, Padley RJ, George JS, Hyland D, Rosebraugh M, Wishart N, Olson L, Long AJ. In vitro and in vivo characterization of the JAK1 selectivity of upadacitinib (ABT-494) BMC Rheumatol. 2018;2(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s41927-018-0031-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, Kivitz A, Bessette L, Li Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2503–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2. - PubMed
    1. Leonard WJ. Role of Jak kinases and STATs in cytokine signal transduction. Int J Hematol. 2001;73(3):271–277. doi: 10.1007/BF02981951. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Shea JJ, Plenge R. JAK and STAT signaling molecules in immunoregulation and immune-mediated disease. Immunity. 2012;36(4):542–550. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kremer JM, Emery P, Camp HS, Friedman A, Wang L, Othman AA, Khan N, Pangan AL, Jungerwirth S, Keystone EC. A phase IIb study of ABT-494, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2016;68(12):2867–2877. doi: 10.1002/art.39801. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms