Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;30(2):569-579.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04215-6.

Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015-2017

Affiliations

Trends in Drain Utilization in Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database 2015-2017

Benjamin Clapp et al. Obes Surg. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most common bariatric operations. With the implementation of enhanced recovery protocols, the use of drains should decrease.

Methods: The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was queried for the years 2015-2017. Our inclusion criteria included all patients undergoing a primary LRYGB, SG, and revisions. We examined demographics, operative characteristics, the use of drains, and postoperative complications. Continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations (SD). Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and proportions. Student's T test (Wilcoxon sum rank test in the case of skewed data) and chi-squared analysis were used to assess the baseline differences in drain utilization.

Results: From 2015 to 2017, there were 388,239 bariatric cases performed without drains and 100,221 performed with drains. Twenty-nine percent of LRYGB patients had a drain placed but only 16.7% of SG patients. The percentage of LRYGB that had a drain dropped from 33.1 to 24.6% during the study period and that of SG dropped from 20.3 to 13.6%. Patients that had drains placed were more likely to have a provocative test at the time of surgery (prevalence ratio (PR) 2.24) and to have a postoperative swallow study (PR 1.93).

Conclusions: Drains are still commonly used in bariatric patients. Over the study period, there was a decrease in the use of drains in both bypass and sleeve patients. Patients with a drain were more likely to have had a provocative test and a swallow study and have a higher rate of complications and mortality.

Keywords: Abdominal drains; Bariatric surgery; MBSAQIP; Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of drain usage by year and operation

References

    1. Teixeira UF, Goldoni MB, Machry MC, Ceccon PN, Fontes PR, Waechter FL. Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and cost-effective: a Brazilian single center experience. Arq Gastroenterol. 2016;53:103–107. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032016000200010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson WS, Fuhrman GS, Burch E, Bolton JS, Bowen JC. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes of 847 planned procedures. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:193–195. doi: 10.1007/s004640000301. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wittgrove A, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4:353–357. doi: 10.1381/096089294765558331. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barreca M, Renzi C, Tankel J, Shalhoub J, Sengupta N. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. King AB, Spann MD, Jablonski P, Wanderer JP, Sandberg WS, Mcevoy MD. An enhanced recovery program for bariatric surgical patients significantly reduces perioperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:849–856. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.010. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms