Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;5(Suppl 2):S166-S173.
doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.05.

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression in an ambulatory surgery center

Affiliations

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression in an ambulatory surgery center

Dil V Patel et al. J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background: There is limited data regarding clinical and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD) as an outpatient procedure. In this context, our purpose is to evaluate a single surgeon's experience with performing MIS LD in the outpatient versus inpatient setting and determining if there are differences in surgical and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary, one- to three-level MIS LD were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by surgical setting: ambulatory surgical center (ASC) versus hospital. The cohorts were compared with respect to demographics, perioperative characteristics, complications, postoperative pain and narcotics consumption, and improvements in patient-reported outcomes.

Results: Five hundred and nine patients were included: 332 patients underwent surgery at an ASC and 177 patients underwent surgery at a hospital. The ASC patients were younger, more likely to be male, and carry Workers' Compensation insurance. The hospital patients were older, more likely to be diabetic, and had a greater comorbidity burden. Patients undergoing MIS LD in an ASC were less likely to have multi-level procedures and more likely to have decompression with discectomy compared to patients in the hospital cohort. There were two cases of superficial wound infection in the ASC cohort and a single case of a pulmonary embolus in the hospital cohort. Additionally, a total of 28 patients had recurrent herniated nucleus pulposus in the ASC cohort compared to 12 patients in the hospital cohort. There was one case of residual stenosis in the ASC cohort compared to eight cases in the hospital cohort. Both cohorts demonstrated similar preoperative ODI, VAS back pain, and VAS leg pain scores through 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions: MIS LD is a safe and effective procedure in an ASC, however, appropriate patient selection and postoperative protocols are imperative in minimizing complications and optimizing safety and efficacy in the outpatient setting.

Keywords: Minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD); Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); ambulatory surgical center (ASC); back pain; complications; leg pain; outpatient setting; visual analog scale (VAS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Johans SJ, Amin BY, Mummaneni PV. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression for lumbar stenosis: review of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness. J Neurosurg Sci 2015;59:37-45. - PubMed
    1. Fabricant PD, Seeley MA, Rozell JC, et al. Cost Savings From Utilization of an Ambulatory Surgery Center for Orthopaedic Day Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24:865-71. 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00751 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy for Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:E91-100. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001161 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE. Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a historical review. Neurosurg Focus 2009;27:E9. 10.3171/2009.7.FOCUS09121 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Idowu OA, Boyajian HH, Ramos E, et al. Trend of Spine Surgeries in the Outpatient Hospital Setting Versus Ambulatory Surgical Center. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:E1429-36. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002180 - DOI - PubMed