Detection of Gastrointestinal Nematode Populations Resistant to Albendazole and Ivermectin in Sheep
- PMID: 31658591
- PMCID: PMC6826479
- DOI: 10.3390/ani9100775
Detection of Gastrointestinal Nematode Populations Resistant to Albendazole and Ivermectin in Sheep
Abstract
Gastrointestinal parasite infections represent a major welfare problem in small ruminants reared in extensive systems, which may be exacerbated by anthelmintic resistance. Therefore, we aimed to study the efficacy of albendazole and ivermectin in sheep. Eighty-six animals were selected from commercial farms in the temperate area of the State of Mexico at the age of seven months. These animals were randomly distributed into three groups: Group A, treated with albendazole, Group I, treated with ivermectin and Group C, left untreated. Faecal samples were collected before the anthelmintic was administered and 15 days post-treatment. Both Group A and Group I displayed a significant decrease of faecal egg counts when pre- and post-treatment values were compared (p = 0.003 and p = 0.049, respectively), and a significantly lower faecal egg count when compared with Group C after the treatment (p < 0.05). However, the faecal egg count reduction test showed that gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) developed anthelmintic resistance to both albendazole and ivermectin. The results of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) allowed the identification of Cooperia spp., and Trichostrongylus colubriformis. The allele-specific PCR results confirmed that T. colubriformis was resistant to albendazole. In conclusion, this study showed the presence of resistant GIN to albendazole and ivermectin in sheep reared in Mexican temperate zones. Therefore, nematode infections should be systematically monitored in order to implement integrated management strategies to prevent the spread of anthelmintic resistance.
Keywords: anthelminthic resistance; benzimidazole; gastrointestinal nematodes; ivermectin; sheep.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Nuncio-Ochoa G., Nahed T.J., Díaz Hernández B., Escobedo Amezcua F., Salvatierra Izaba E.B. Caracterización de los sistemas de producción ovina en el estado de Tabasco. Agrociencia. 2001;35:469–477.
-
- Galaviz-Rodríguez J.R., Vargas-López S., Zaragoza-Ramírez J.L., Bustamante González A., Ramírez-Bribiesca E., Guerrero-Rodríguez J.D., Hernández Zapata J.S. Evaluación territorial de los sistemas de producción ovina en la región norponiente de Tlaxcala. Rev. Mex. Técnica Pecu. 2011;2:53–68.
-
- Orona Castillo I., López Martínez J.D., Vázquez Vázquez C., Salazar Sosa E., Ramírez Ramírez M.E. Microeconomic analysis of representative production units of sheep in Mexico under a semi intensive production system. Rev. Mex. Agronegocios. 2014;34:720–728.
-
- Pérez Hernández P., Vilaboa Arroniz J., Chalate Molina H., Martínez B.C., Díaz Rivera P., López Ortiz S. Descriptive Analysis of Sheep Production Systems in the State of Veracruz, Mexico. Rev. Científica. 2011;21:327–334.
-
- EFSA AHAW Panel (EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare) Scientific opinion on the welfare risks related to the farming of sheep for wool, meat and milk production. EFSA J. 2014;12:3933.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources