Changes in Pupil Area during Low-energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery
- PMID: 31660103
- PMCID: PMC6815335
- DOI: 10.18502/jovr.v14i3.4780
Changes in Pupil Area during Low-energy Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery
Abstract
Purpose: To study the potential changes in pupil area within low-energy femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).
Methods: A retrospective assessment of the pupil size was performed in the eyes undergoing FLACS using the Ziemer LDV Z8. We measured the pupil diameters as part of the images taken preoperatively and at the completion of laser pretreatment (after releasing the suction). We calculated the pupil area in 40 eyes of 40 patients (14 right and 26 left eyes). The mean standard deviation (SD) of age of the patients was 74 7.4 years (range: 51-87). Paired t-test was used for statistical analyses. Subgroups were built with reference to age and preoperative pupil area (smaller than or equal to the median versus larger than the median).
Results: The mean SD axial length, anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance and lens thickness were 24.01 1.47, 3.23 0.4, 11.97 0.49, and 4.59 0.41 mm, respectively. The mean SD pupil area was 39.33 7.1 mm preoperatively and 39.3 6.75 mm after laser pretreatment. The mean SD change in pupil area was -0.03 2.12 mm . There were no statistically significant changes between preoperative and post-laser pupil areas (P = 0.93, 95% CI: -0.71 to 0.65). Comparisons within subgroups also did not detect pupil area reduction.
Conclusion: This study did not detect statistically significant changes in pupil area after laser pretreatment using low-energy FLACS. This observation is in contrast to previous studies using other laser platforms.
Keywords: Femtosecond Laser; Pupil Size; Safety; Cataract Surgery.
Copyright © 2019 Mirshahi and Ponto.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Pupil Status with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification: An Intraindividual Comparative Study.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 24;17:331-339. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S399788. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36718349 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative pupil size in low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.PLoS One. 2021 May 17;16(5):e0251549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251549. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33999970 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Pretreatment on Pupil Diameter: A Comparison Between Three Laser Platforms.J Refract Surg. 2016 Feb;32(2):84-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151229-03. J Refract Surg. 2016. PMID: 26856424
-
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery--current status and future directions.Surv Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):103-31. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 26. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 26409902 Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Compared with Manual Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of 14 567 Eyes.Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2113-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 15. Ophthalmology. 2016. PMID: 27538796 Review.
Cited by
-
Cataract Grade and Pupil: Comparison Between Conventional Phacoemulsification and Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 2;17:2193-2200. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S420931. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37551374 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of cataract surgery performed with a low-energy femtosecond laser compared with conventional phacoemulsification in Chinese patients: a randomized clinical trial.Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Jul 2;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00347-0. Eye Vis (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37393278 Free PMC article.
-
Pupil Status with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification: An Intraindividual Comparative Study.Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 24;17:331-339. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S399788. eCollection 2023. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36718349 Free PMC article.
-
Cystoid Macular Edema Following Cataract Surgery with Low-Energy Femtosecond Laser versus Conventional Phacoemulsification.Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 25;14:2873-2878. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S261565. eCollection 2020. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33061272 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative complications of cataract surgery using a low-energy femtosecond laser: Results from a real-world high-volume setting.PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0279023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279023. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36520860 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ewe SY., Abell RG., Vote BJ. Vote BJ. Femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification for cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation: clinical outcomes review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 54-60: 29; 2018. Femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification for cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation: clinical outcomes review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol; pp. 29–54. - PubMed
-
- Grewal DS., Schultz T., Basti S., Dick HB. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeryâ€. 103-131: 61; 2016. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeryΓ, current status and future directions. Surv Ophthalmol; pp. 61–103. - PubMed
-
- Lundstrom M., Dickman M., Henry Y., Manning S., Rosen P., Tassignon MJ. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeries reported to the European registry of quality outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery: baseline characteristics, surgical procedure, and outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1549-1556: 43; 2017. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources