Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct 28;8(4):199.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040199.

Sepsis and Nosocomial Infections: The Role of Medico-Legal Experts in Italy

Affiliations
Review

Sepsis and Nosocomial Infections: The Role of Medico-Legal Experts in Italy

Lucia Tattoli et al. Antibiotics (Basel). .

Abstract

Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is defined as the presence of a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and it represents a significant burden for the healthcare system. This is particularly true when it is diagnosed in the setting of nosocomial infections, which are usually a matter of concern with regard to medical liability being correlated with increasing economic costs and people's loss of trust in healthcare. Hence, the Italian governance promotes the clinical risk management with the aim of improving the quality and safety of healthcare services. In this context, the role of medico-legal experts working in a hospital setting is fundamental for performing autopsy to diagnose sepsis and link it with possible nosocomial infections. On the other hand, medico-legal experts are party to the clinical risk management assessment, and deal with malpractice cases and therefore contribute to formulating clinical guidelines and procedures for improving patient safety and healthcare providers' work practices. Due to this scenario, the authors here discuss the role of medico-legal experts in Italy, focusing on sepsis and nosocomial infections.

Keywords: forensic; inflammation; malpractice; medico-legal expert; nosocomial infection; postmortem diagnosis; risk management; sepsis; septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Denstaedt S.J., Singer B.H., Standiford T.J. Sepsis and nosocomial infection: Patient characteristics, mechanisms, and modulation. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02446. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R., Bernard G.R., Chiche J.-D., Coopersmith C.M., et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ducel G., Fabry J., Nicolle L. Prevention of Hospital Acquired Infections: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. World Health Organisation; Geneva, Switzerland: 2002.
    1. Siracusa M., Scuri S., Grappasonni I., Petrelli F. Healthcare acquired infections: Malpractice and litigation issues. Ann. Ig. 2019;31:496–506. - PubMed
    1. Di Luca A., Vetrugno G., Pascali V.L., Oliva A., Ozonoff A. Perspectives on patient safety and medical malpractice: A comparison of medical and legal systems in Italy and the United States. J. Patient Saf. 2018;19:1–4. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000460. - DOI - PubMed