Reliability of thermocautery-assisted circumcision: retrospective analysis of circumcision performed voluntarily in countries of low socioeconomic status
- PMID: 31662793
- PMCID: PMC6792273
- DOI: 10.1177/1756287219882598
Reliability of thermocautery-assisted circumcision: retrospective analysis of circumcision performed voluntarily in countries of low socioeconomic status
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of thermocautery-assisted circumcision performed voluntarily in patients of poor countries.
Material and methods: Between 2016 and 2019, 32,000 children aged 7 days to 17 years were circumcised in multiple countries. The patients' urological examinations were done before the administration of local anaesthesia. Patients revealed to have undescended testicle, inguinal hernia, hypospadias, varicocele, penile rotation anomaly, epispadias and infection were not circumcised. All procedures were performed under local anaesthesia by using thermocautery. Afterwards, mucosa and skin were sutured using absorbable suture and the circumcised penis was dressed. Patients were instructed to remove the dressing after 3 days.
Results: Bleeding, requiring surgical intervention and drug reactions were not observed. The most observed complication was mucosal oedema, which occurred in approximately one-quarter of patients (26%, 8320/32,000) and continued for 3-5 days after the surgery. The most serious complication was a trapped penis, which occurred in 25 patients (0.078%). In six (0.018%) cases, meatal stenosis developed. Wound infection developed in only 10 (0.03%) cases, through the formation of an aseptic environment. Penile adhesion was seen in 35 cases (0.1%) and improved with anti-inflammatory treatment without any surgical intervention.
Conclusion: Thermocautery-assisted circumcision can be used as an effective, safe and useful technique with few complications and rapid healing rates.
Keywords: bleeding; circumcision; thermocautery; urinary system infection.
© The Author(s), 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Thermal cautery-assisted circumcision and principles of its use to decrease complication rates.J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Apr;15(2):186.e1-186.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 19. J Pediatr Urol. 2019. PMID: 30770302
-
Examination of short and long term complications of thermocautery, plastic clamping, and surgical circumcision techniques.Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Nov-Dec;33(6):1418-1423. doi: 10.12669/pjms.336.13640. Pak J Med Sci. 2017. PMID: 29492070 Free PMC article.
-
Examination of histopathological changes of scalpel, monopolar, bipolar, and thermocautery applications in rat experimental circumcision model.Am J Transl Res. 2017 May 15;9(5):2306-2313. eCollection 2017. Am J Transl Res. 2017. PMID: 28559981 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal circumcision.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;48(6):1539-57. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70390-4. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11732129 Review.
-
[An unexpected complication: glans ischemia after circumcision. Review of the literature].Cir Pediatr. 2016 Jul 10;29(3):127-130. Cir Pediatr. 2016. PMID: 28393509 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Assessment of the Knowledge and Attitudes of Muslim Religious Officials Regarding Male Circumcision: The Case of Turkey.J Relig Health. 2025 Apr;64(2):1159-1172. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02187-1. Epub 2024 Nov 14. J Relig Health. 2025. PMID: 39542980
References
-
- Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int 1999; 83: 1–12. - PubMed
-
- Rickwood AMK. Medical indications for circumcision. BJU Int 1999; 83(Suppl. 1): 45– 51. - PubMed
-
- Cao D, Liu L, Hu Y, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang ring vs conventional circumcision. Urology 2015; 85: 799–804. - PubMed
-
- Polat F, Tuncel A, Balci M, et al. Comparison of local anesthetic effects of lidocaine versus tramadol and effect of child anxiety on pain level in circumcision procedure. J Pediatr Urol 2013; 9: 670–674. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. WHO/UNAIDS: Male circumcision – global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability. Washington, DC: World Health Organization, 2008.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources