Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Sep 29:2019:9869274.
doi: 10.1155/2019/9869274. eCollection 2019.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of a Proximal Esophageal Pyogenic Granuloma

Affiliations
Case Reports

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of a Proximal Esophageal Pyogenic Granuloma

Elias Estifan et al. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. .

Abstract

Pyogenic Granuloma (PG), also known as lobular capillary hemangioma, is usually seen as a polypoid red lesion found on the skin or the mucosal surface of the oral cavity. PG of the gastrointestinal tract is rare, in particular involving the esophagus, only 14 cases have been reported in the English literature. We present an 80-year-old male who underwent endoscopy for evaluation of dysphagia and was found to have a single, red, bilobed 10 mm polyp with adherent white exudate approximately 19 cm from the incisors. Endoscopic ultrasound was performed with a 20 mHz miniprobe which showed the lesion contained to the mucosal layer with no muscularis propria invasion. A decision was made to perform endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). A mixture of saline and methylene blue was injected into the submucosal plane to raise the lesion with subsequent successful mucosal hot snare resection. The resection defect was then approximated and closed with a hemostatic clip to prevent bleeding. Pathology of the specimen revealed small capillary vessels growing in a lobular architecture with an edematous stroma and a florid inflammatory infiltrate representing a pyogenic granuloma. EMR allows for an en bloc resection of mucosal lesions with tumor-free margins, thereby providing both diagnostic and prognostic information. Comparing EMR with the novel technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the incidence of bleeding and perforation is much lower; making EMR the best and safest resection option for this rare hemangioma. In this case, we demonstrate that EMR is a safe technique in removing a pyogenic granuloma in the esophagus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Endoscopic image showing a single, red, bilobed 10 mm polyp with whitish exudate in the proximal esophagus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endoscopic image of the mucosal snare resection being performed after saline and methylene blue injection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Endoscopic image of the post-polypectomy site with no residual tissue remaining and no evidence of bleeding.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Endoscopic image of successful closure of the post-polypectomy site with a hemostatic clip.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Pathology imaging revealed small capillary vessels growing in a lobular architecture with an edematous stroma and a florid inflammatory infiltrate representing a pyogenic granuloma.

References

    1. Hoekstra E. R., Fockens P., Scholten P. A 15-year-old boy with an esophageal pyogenic granuloma and subsequent Barrett’s esophagus (with videos) Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2007;65(7):1086–1088. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suarez-Zamora D. A., Rodriguez-Urrego P. A., Solano-Mariño J., Sierra-Arango F., Palau-Lazaro M. A. Esophageal pyogenic granuloma: a case report and review of the literature. International Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2018;26(8):735–738. - PubMed
    1. Poncet A. D. L. Botryomycose humaine. Rev Chir. 1897;18:996–1003.
    1. Hartzell M. B. Granuloma pyogenicus. Journal of Cutaneous Diseases. 1904;22:520–523.
    1. Bhaskar S. N., Jacoway J. R. Pyogenic granuloma–clinical features, incidence, histology, and result of treatment: report of 242 cases. Journal Oral Surgery. 1966;24(5):391–398. - PubMed

Publication types