Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;91(1):33-41.
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1682851. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Affiliations

Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Håvard Dale et al. Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background and purpose - There is no consensus on best method of fixation in hip arthroplasty. We investigated different modes of fixation in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the influence of age and sex, to assess need for a differentiated approach.Patients and methods - The study was based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register in the period 2005-2017. Included were all-cemented, all-uncemented, reverse hybrid (uncemented stem and cemented cup), and hybrid (cemented stem and uncemented cup) THA designs that were commonly used, contemporary and well documented, using different causes of revision as endpoints.Results - From the included 66,995 primary THAs, 2,242 (3.3%) were revised. Compared with all-cemented THAs, all-uncemented had a higher risk of revision due to any cause (RR 1.4; CI 1.2-1.6), mainly due to an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture (RR 5.2; CI 3.2-8.5) and dislocation (RR 2.2; CI 1.5-3.0). Women had considerably higher risk of revision due to periprosthetic fracture after all-uncemented THA (RR 12; CI 6-25), compared with cemented. All-uncemented THAs in women of age 55-75 years (RR 1.3; CI 1.0-1.7) and over 75 years of age (RR 1.8; CI 1.2-2.7), and reverse hybrid THAs in women over the age of 75 (RR 1.5; CI 1.1-1.9) had higher risk of revision compared with cemented. Hybrid THAs (RR 1.0; CI 0.9-1.2) and reverse hybrid THAs (RR 1.0; CI 0.7-1.3) had similar risk of revision due to any cause as cemented THAs.Interpretation - Uncemented stems (all-uncemented and reverse hybrid THAs) had increased risk of revision in women over 55 years of age, mainly due to periprosthetic fracture and dislocation, and should probably not be used in THA in these patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion of THAs. a There may be more than 1 missing variable per THA.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Adjusted implant survival curves with any revision as endpoint, for the 4 types of THA fixation in all THAs, THA in males, and THA in females, adjusted for age, sex (in all THAs only), ASA class, indication for primary THA, surgical approach, articulation, head size of the prosthesis, and year of primary surgery
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Graphical representation of the relationship between age at primary THA and the log relative risk (RR) for revision due to all causes for uncemented and reverse hybrid compared with cemented THAs, for women and men with 95% confidence intervals. The horizontal green line shows the reference hazard rate ratio (RR = 1) of cemented THAs. The vertical lines indicate 55 and 75 years of age. We adjusted for ASA class, indication for primary THA, surgical approach, articulation, head size of the prosthesis, and year of primary surgery in the analyses. Hybrid THAs are omitted due to low numbers.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Adjusted implant survival curves for different causes of revision for 3 types of THA fixation in women and men, adjusted for age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, surgical approach, articulation, head size of the prosthesis, and year of primary surgery. Hybrid THAs are omitted due to low numbers.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Graphical representation of the relationship between year postoperatively and the log relative risk (RR) for revision due to all causes for uncemented, reverse hybrid, and hybrid THAs, compared with cemented THAs, with 95% confidence intervals. The horizontal green line shows the reference hazard rate ratio (RR = 1) of cemented THAs. The vertical lines indicate 1 and 3 years postoperatively. We adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, surgical approach, articulation, head size of the prosthesis, and year of primary surgery in the analyses

References

    1. Abdel M P, Watts C D, Houdek M T, Lewallen D G, Berry D J. Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-b (4): 461–7. - PubMed
    1. Al-Dirini R M A, Martelli S, O’Rourke D, Huff D, Zhang J, Clement J G, et al. . Virtual trial to evaluate the robustness of cementless femoral stems to patient and surgical variation. J Biomech 2019; 82: 346–56. - PubMed
    1. Alm J J, Makinen T J, Lankinen P, Moritz N, Vahlberg T, Aro H T. Female patients with low systemic BMD are prone to bone loss in Gruen zone 7 after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (5): 531–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broomfield J A, Malak T T, Thomas G E, Palmer A J, Taylor A, Glyn-Jones S. The relationship between polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty at 12 years in a randomized controlled trial cohort. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (4): 1186–91. - PubMed
    1. Chatziagorou G, Lindahl H, Karrholm J. The design of the cemented stem influences the risk of Vancouver type B fractures, but not of type C: an analysis of 82,837 Lubinus SPII and Exeter Polished stems. Acta Orthop 2019: 1–13. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms