Prevalence of Risk and Protective Factors for Tick Exposure and Tick-Borne Disease Among Residents of Indiana
- PMID: 31663930
- DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001070
Prevalence of Risk and Protective Factors for Tick Exposure and Tick-Borne Disease Among Residents of Indiana
Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence of risk and protective factors for tick exposure and tick-borne disease (TBD) based on gender and living in urban or rural areas (urbanicity) among a cross section of Indiana adults.
Methods: Data were collected from 3003 adults (81% response rate) spread across all 92 Indiana counties. Study participants were recruited from existing online panels maintained by Qualtrics. We calculated prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 8 primary outcomes for 2 different exposures: (1) gender (male/female) and (2) urbanicity.
Results: Female participants were 10% less likely to find a tick on themselves than male participants (PR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99) and significantly more likely to worry about their health and safety because of ticks, whereas males avoided the outdoors less because of worry about ticks. Female participants were significantly more likely to adopt various personal protective measures, specifically because of concern for ticks. Female participants were also less likely to have been told by a health care provider that they have a TBD (PR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.75). Rural participants were significantly more likely to report seeing a tick at their residential property (PR = 2.40; 95% CI, 2.11-2.76), report finding ticks on themselves (PR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.68-2.23), and report finding a tick on a child at their residential property within the past 6 months than urban dwellers (PR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.77). In addition, we found that 62% of participants have very high trust in government sources of information on TBD and tick prevention.
Conclusions: In Indiana, the area around people's residences may constitute an important source of tick exposure for humans. Being exposed to ticks is most prevalent in those living in rural areas of Indiana. Finally, risk factors for TBD are higher among males than among females.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Lindgren E, Talleklint L, Polfeldt T. Impact of climatic change on the northern latitude limit and population density of the disease-transmitting European tick Ixodes ricinus . Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(2):119–123.
-
- Rynkiewicz EC, Clay K. Tick community composition in Midwestern US habitats in relation to sampling method and environmental conditions. Exp Appl Acarol. 2014;64(1):109–119.
-
- Leger E, Vourc'h G, Vial L, et al. Changing distributions of ticks: causes and consequences. Exp Appl Acarol. 2013;59(1/2):219–244.
-
- US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Notifiable infectious diseases and conditions data tables. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/infectious-tables.html . Accessed November 22, 2018.
-
- Christensen J, Fischer RJ, McCoy BN, et al. Tickborne relapsing fever, Bitterroot Valley, Montana, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):217.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
