Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;84(3):263-270.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059.

Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Affiliations

Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Shayda J Mirhaidari et al. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Implant-based reconstruction is currently the most common postmastectomy breast reconstruction modality with over 86,000 procedures performed in 2017. Although various methods for reconstruction techniques have been described, partial subpectoral implant placement with or without acellular dermal matrix coverage remains the most popular approach. Recently, prepectoral implant placement has gained increased recognition as a method that avoids some of the potential morbidities of submuscular implant placement. Currently, few studies have examined the outcomes of performing this approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral direct to implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction.

Methods: Data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions at our institution from February 2016 to November 2017 were collected. The incidence of complications such as mastectomy skin flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, implant loss, and unexpected reoperation were recorded and compared with a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent subpectoral DTI immediate breast reconstruction from May 2014 to July 2015.

Results: One hundred twelve prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions were performed on 62 patients. Four breasts (4.4%) were diagnosed with infection. There were 8 breasts (7.1%) that suffered from mastectomy skin flap necrosis (5 partial thickness necrosis, 3 full thickness necrosis). There was 1 implant loss related to full thickness necrosis that required salvage with autologous tissue reconstruction. Prepectoral breast reconstruction had less esthetic revisions and comparable complications when compared with the historical subpectoral cohort.

Conclusions: When compared with the subpectoral DTI approach, prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction grants favorable complication rates and improved esthetic outcomes. Prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction is a safe modality that should be considered in any patient who is a candidate for immediate breast reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US Breast Cancer Statistics. 2019 February. Available at: http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics. Accessed February 28, 2019.
    1. Morrow M, Alderman AK, Jagsi R, et al. Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1015–1021.
    1. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15–23.
    1. Bostwick J III, Carlson GW. Reconstruction of the breast. Surg Oncol Clin North Am. 1997;6:71–89.
    1. 2017 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. 2019 January. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-su.... Accessed January 25, 2019.

LinkOut - more resources