Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction
- PMID: 31663934
- DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002059
Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Abstract
Background: Implant-based reconstruction is currently the most common postmastectomy breast reconstruction modality with over 86,000 procedures performed in 2017. Although various methods for reconstruction techniques have been described, partial subpectoral implant placement with or without acellular dermal matrix coverage remains the most popular approach. Recently, prepectoral implant placement has gained increased recognition as a method that avoids some of the potential morbidities of submuscular implant placement. Currently, few studies have examined the outcomes of performing this approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral direct to implant (DTI) immediate breast reconstruction.
Methods: Data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions at our institution from February 2016 to November 2017 were collected. The incidence of complications such as mastectomy skin flap necrosis, seroma, hematoma, infection, implant loss, and unexpected reoperation were recorded and compared with a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent subpectoral DTI immediate breast reconstruction from May 2014 to July 2015.
Results: One hundred twelve prepectoral DTI immediate breast reconstructions were performed on 62 patients. Four breasts (4.4%) were diagnosed with infection. There were 8 breasts (7.1%) that suffered from mastectomy skin flap necrosis (5 partial thickness necrosis, 3 full thickness necrosis). There was 1 implant loss related to full thickness necrosis that required salvage with autologous tissue reconstruction. Prepectoral breast reconstruction had less esthetic revisions and comparable complications when compared with the historical subpectoral cohort.
Conclusions: When compared with the subpectoral DTI approach, prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction grants favorable complication rates and improved esthetic outcomes. Prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction is a safe modality that should be considered in any patient who is a candidate for immediate breast reconstruction.
Similar articles
-
Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Implant Placement.Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;84(4):361-365. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002028. Ann Plast Surg. 2020. PMID: 31633546
-
Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Feb;68(2):162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 16. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015. PMID: 25455288
-
Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 20;22(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01683-z. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 35718764 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Aug;75(8):2550-2560. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Feb 24. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022. PMID: 35393263
-
Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2023 May 1;90(5):506-515. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003524. Epub 2023 Mar 8. Ann Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36975095
Cited by
-
Comparing outcomes of prepectoral, partial muscle-splitting subpectoral, and dual-plane subpectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction: implant upward migration and the pectoralis muscle.Gland Surg. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):852-863. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-45. Epub 2024 Jun 26. Gland Surg. 2024. PMID: 39015706 Free PMC article.
-
Drain Removal Time in Pre-pectoral versus Dual Plane Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction following Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 23;10(5):e4295. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004295. eCollection 2022 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022. PMID: 35620500 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Pre-BRA prospective multicentre cohort study.Br J Surg. 2022 May 16;109(6):530-538. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac077. Br J Surg. 2022. PMID: 35576373 Free PMC article.
-
A Sustainable Approach to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Jan 21;9(1):e3392. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003392. eCollection 2021 Jan. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021. PMID: 33564601 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing Acellular Dermal Matrix Integration in Heterologous Breast Reconstructive Surgery: Surgical Tips and Post-Operative Management.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 30;59(7):1231. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071231. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37512043 Free PMC article.
References
-
- US Breast Cancer Statistics. 2019 February. Available at: http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics. Accessed February 28, 2019.
-
- Morrow M, Alderman AK, Jagsi R, et al. Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1015–1021.
-
- Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15–23.
-
- Bostwick J III, Carlson GW. Reconstruction of the breast. Surg Oncol Clin North Am. 1997;6:71–89.
-
- 2017 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. 2019 January. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-su.... Accessed January 25, 2019.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical