Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 1;59(7):1632-1639.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez482.

Validation of the self-administered comorbidity questionnaire adjusted for spondyloarthritis: results from the ASAS-COMOSPA study

Affiliations

Validation of the self-administered comorbidity questionnaire adjusted for spondyloarthritis: results from the ASAS-COMOSPA study

Carmen Stolwijk et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Objective: To confirm validity of the Self-administered Comorbidity Questionnaire modified for patients with SpA (mSCQ), and assess whether validity improves when adding items on extra-articular manifestations (EAMs), i.e. uveitis, psoriasis, and IBD, and osteoporosis and fractures.

Methods: Data from the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society COMOrbidities in SPondyloArthritis study were used. Criterion validity of presence of EAMs, osteoporosis and fractures was assessed as agreement (kappa) between patients' self-reported and physician-confirmed disease. Construct validity of the mSCQ including EAMs, osteoporosis and/or fractures (SpA-SCQ) was assessed by testing hypotheses about correlations with demographics, physical function, work ability, health utility and disease activity, and was compared with construct validity of the rheumatic disease comorbidity index.

Results: In total, 3984 patients contributed to the analyses. Agreement between patient-reported and physician-reported EAMs was substantial to almost perfect (uveitis ĸ = 0.81, IBD ĸ = 0.73, psoriasis ĸ = 0.86). Agreement for osteoporosis (ĸ = 0.38) and fractures (ĸ = 0.39) was fair. As hypothesized, the mSCQ correlated moderately to weakly with age, physical function, work limitations and health utility, and very weakly with disease activity. In contrast to our hypothesis, adding EAMs, osteoporosis and/or fractures to the mSCQ decreased correlations with several external constructs, especially among patients with peripheral SpA. Correlations with the different constructs were stronger for the both mSCQ and SpA-SCQ (rBASFI = 0.34; rEQ-5D = -0.33) compared with the rheumatic disease comorbidity index (rBASFI = 0.24; rEQ-5D = -0.21).

Conclusion: The mSCQ is a valid self-report instrument to assess the influence of comorbidities on health outcomes in patients with SpA. Adding EAMs and/or osteoporosis or fractures does not improve validity of the mSCQ.

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis; comorbidity; comorbidity questionnaire; extra-articular manifestations; peripheral spondyloarthritis; spondyloarthritis; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stolwijk C, van Tubergen A, Castillo-Ortiz JD, Boonen A.. Prevalence of extra-articular manifestations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:65–73. - PubMed
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Khan MA, Braun J, Sieper J.. How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:535–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R. et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777–83. - PubMed
    1. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R. et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for peripheral spondyloarthritis and for spondyloarthritis in general. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:25–31. - PubMed
    1. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C. et al. Relationship between multimorbidity and health-related quality of life of patients in primary care. Qual Life Res 2006;15:83–91. - PubMed

Publication types