Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct 30:367:l5837.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5837.

Estimating the effect of calorie menu labeling on calories purchased in a large restaurant franchise in the southern United States: quasi-experimental study

Affiliations

Estimating the effect of calorie menu labeling on calories purchased in a large restaurant franchise in the southern United States: quasi-experimental study

Joshua Petimar et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether calorie labeling of menus in large restaurant chains was associated with a change in mean calories purchased per transaction.

Design: Quasi-experimental longitudinal study.

Setting: Large franchise of a national fast food company with three different restaurant chains located in the southern United States (Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi) from April 2015 until April 2018.

Participants: 104 restaurants with calorie information added to in-store and drive-thru menus in April 2017 and with weekly aggregated sales data during the pre-labeling (April 2015 to April 2017) and post-labeling (April 2017 to April 2018) implementation period.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was the overall level and trend changes in mean purchased calories per transaction after implementation of calorie labeling compared with the counterfactual (ie, assumption that the pre-intervention trend would have persisted had the intervention not occurred) using interrupted time series analyses with linear mixed models. Secondary outcomes were by item category (entrees, sides, and sugar sweetened beverages). Subgroup analyses estimated the effect of calorie labeling in stratums defined by the sociodemographic characteristics of restaurant census tracts (defined region for taking census).

Results: The analytic sample comprised 14 352 restaurant weeks. Over three years and among 104 restaurants, 49 062 440 transactions took place and 242 726 953 items were purchased. After labeling implementation, a level decrease was observed of 60 calories/transaction (95% confidence interval 48 to 72; about 4%), followed by an increasing trend of 0.71 calories/transaction/week (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.92) independent of the baseline trend over the year after implementation. These results were generally robust to different analytic assumptions in sensitivity analyses. The level decrease and post-implementation trend change were stronger for sides than for entrees or sugar sweetened beverages. The level decrease was similar between census tracts with higher and lower median income, but the post-implementation trend in calories per transaction was higher in low income (change in calories/transaction/week 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 1.21) than in high income census tracts (0.50, 0.19 to 0.81).

Conclusions: A small decrease in mean calories purchased per transaction was observed after implementation of calorie labeling in a large franchise of fast food restaurants. This reduction diminished over one year of follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: funding from the National Institutes of Health (R01DK115492 to JPB) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL098048 to JP); no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flowchart of restaurants through study
Fig 2
Fig 2
Level and trend changes in mean purchased calories per transaction after implementation of calorie labeling. Light orange dots=mean calories per transaction for individual restaurants in a given week; dark orange dots=weekly mean calories per transaction over all restaurants. Purple line=predicted calories per transaction from linear mixed model, which is also adjusted for season and holiday periods (seasonal and holiday effects are shown in supplementary fig 1 panel B). Excluded from the model are transactions made the week of labeling implementation as well as the two weeks before and after, which are represented by vertical dashed lines

Comment in

  • Calorie labelling to reduce obesity.
    Kaur A; researcher; Briggs ADM; academic visitor. Kaur A, et al. BMJ. 2019 Oct 30;367:l6119. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6119. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 31666229 No abstract available.

References

    1. Crockett RA, King SE, Marteau TM, et al. Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;2:CD009315. 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shangguan S, Afshin A, Shulkin M, et al. Food PRICE (Policy Review and Intervention Cost-Effectiveness) Project A Meta-Analysis of Food Labeling Effects on Consumer Diet Behaviors and Industry Practices. Am J Prev Med 2019;56:300-14. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.09.024 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HR 3590, 2010.
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Food Labeling; Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments; Extension of Compliance Date. In: Food and Drug Administration, ed.: Federal Register, 2017:20825-29. - PubMed
    1. Block JP, Condon SK, Kleinman K, et al. Consumers’ estimation of calorie content at fast food restaurants: cross sectional observational study. BMJ 2013;346:f2907. 10.1136/bmj.f2907 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms