Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar;18(3):560-570.
doi: 10.1111/jth.14672. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

Comparison of three transfusion protocols prior to central venous catheterization in patients with cirrhosis: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of three transfusion protocols prior to central venous catheterization in patients with cirrhosis: A randomized controlled trial

Leonardo L Rocha et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Transfusion of blood components prior to invasive procedures in cirrhosis patients is high and associated with adverse events.

Objectives: We compared three transfusion strategies prior to central venous catheterization in cirrhosis patients.

Patients/methods: Single center randomized trial that included critically ill cirrhosis patients with indication for central venous line in a tertiary private hospital in Brazil.

Interventions: Restrictive protocol, thromboelastometry-guided protocol, or usual care (based on coagulogram). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients transfused with any blood component (ie, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, or cryoprecipitate). The secondary endpoints included incidence of bleeding and transfusion-related adverse events.

Results: A total of 57 patients (19 per group; 64.9% male; mean age, 53.4 ± 11.3 years) were enrolled. Prior to catheterization, 3/19 (15.8%) in the restrictive arm, 13/19 (68.4%) in the thromboelastometry-guided arm, and 14/19 (73.7%) in the coagulogram-guided arm received blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR], 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.45; P = .002 for restrictive versus coagulogram-guided arm; OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.56; P = .006 for restrictive versus thromboelastometry-guided arm; and OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.14-4.15; P = .931 for thromboelastometry-guided versus coagulogram-guided arm). The restrictive protocol was cost saving. No difference in bleeding, length of stay, mortality, and transfusion-related adverse events was found.

Conclusions: The use of a restrictive strategy is associated with a reduction in transfusion prior to central venous catheterization and costs in critically ill cirrhosis patients. No effect on bleeding was found among the groups.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02311985.

Keywords: blood coagulation; central venous catheters; critical care; liver cirrhosis; thromboelastography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Parienti J-J, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, et al. Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1220-1229.
    1. Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:391-402.
    1. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1123-1133.
    1. Brass P, Hellmich M, Kolodziej L, Schick G, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD011447.
    1. Zakeri N, Tsochatzis EA. Bleeding risk with invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19:45.

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources