Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):152-154.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4720.

Racial Disparities in Patient-Reported Measures of Physician Cultural Competency Among Cancer Survivors in the United States

Affiliations

Racial Disparities in Patient-Reported Measures of Physician Cultural Competency Among Cancer Survivors in the United States

Santino S Butler et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

This survey study assesses the role that physician cultural competency plays in racial disparities in cancer incidence and outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Rates and Multivariable Adjusted Odds Ratiosa of Patient-Reported Measuresb of Physician Cultural Competencyc
The data were stratified by patient race/ethnicity among 2244 adult cancer survivors included in the 2017 National Health Institute Survey (NHIS). The non–Hispanic white group served as the referent. A, For the belief that physicians sharing or understanding culture was very/somewhat important, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for nonwhite minority cancer survivors was 1.92 (95% CI, 1.46-2.52; P < .001). B, For access to culturally competent physicians, the AOR for nonwhite minority cancer survivors was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.26-0.66; P < .001). For always/most of the time receiving respectful treatment, the AOR was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.47-1.83; P = .83). For receiving easily understandable health information the AOR was 1.15 (95% CI, 0.70-1.90; P = .57), and for being asked about opinions or beliefs regarding care, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.78-1.36; P = 0.85). The error bars represent 95% CIs. aIn addition to race/ethnicity, the models were also adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male vs female [referent]), sexual orientation, (heterosexual/“straight, that is, not lesbian or gay” [referent] vs lesbian, gay, bisexual, or “something else” vs unknown [including responses of “I don’t know”]), citizenship status (US citizen [referent] vs non US citizen vs unknown), country of birth, (US born in 50 states [referent] vs all other birthplaces vs unknown), language spoken during NHIS interview, (English only [referent] vs any non-English), family income-to-poverty ratio (<1.00 vs 1.00-1.99 vs 2.00-3.99 [referent] vs ≥4.00), primary source of insurance, (private [referent] vs Medicare vs military based vs Medicaid vs uninsured [including Indian Health Services and Single-Service plans] vs unknown), highest education level attained, (less than high school vs high school diploma/GED vs some college vs college degree or greater [referent]), marital status (married/living with partner [referent] vs separated/widowed vs unknown), US geographic region, (Northeast [referent] vs Midwest vs South vs West), self-reported health status, (excellent vs very good vs good [referent] vs fair vs poor vs unknown), and place of usual care when sick (doctor’s office/health center/outpatient clinic/health maintenance organization/urgent care/walk-in clinic [referent] vs emergency department/other/unknown). There were no respondents with unknown variables of age or sex. Analyses were adjusted for 2 respondents with unknown race/ethnicity category. bSurvey question 1 (excluding 13 nonresponders): “Some people think it is important for their providers to understand or share their race or ethnicity or gender or religion or beliefs or native language. How important is it to you that your health care providers understand or are similar to you in any of these ways?” Respondents selected from 4 possible answers: “very important,” “somewhat important,” “slightly important,” or “not important at all.” Answers were binarily categorized a priori as “very important”/“somewhat important” vs “slightly important”/“not important at all.” Survey question 2 (excluding 24 nonresponders and 1263 participants not asked this question by the NHIS given response of “not important at all” in question 1): “How often were you able to see health care providers who were similar to you in any of these ways?” For questions 2 to 5, respondents selected from 4 possible answers: “always,” “most of the time,” “some of the time,” or “none of the time.” Answers were binarily categorized as “always”/“most of the time” (ie, frequently) vs “some of the time”/“none of the time.” Survey question 3 (excluding 4 nonresponders): “How often were you treated with respect by your health care providers?” Survey question 4 (excluding 4 nonresponders): “How often did your health care providers tell or give you information about your health and health care that was easy to understand?” Survey question 5 (excluding 14 nonresponders): “How often did your health care providers ask for your opinions or beliefs about your medical care or treatment? For example, what kind of tests, procedures, or medications you prefer.” cThe NHIS defined culture as “any race or ethnicity or gender or religion or beliefs or native language.”

References

    1. Polite BN, Adams-Campbell LL, Brawley OW, et al. . Charting the future of cancer health disparities research: a position statement from the American Association for Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the National Cancer Institute. Cancer Res. 2017;77(17):4548-4555. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0623 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. . Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(2):78-93. doi:10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkfield KM, Flowers CR, Patel JD, et al. . American Society of Clinical Oncology strategic plan for increasing racial and ethnic diversity in the oncology workforce. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2576-2579. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.73.1372 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winkfield KM, Flowers CR, Mitchell EP. Making the case for improving oncology workforce diversity. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2017;37:18-22. doi:10.14694/EDBK_100010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National health interview survey: methods. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/methods.htm. Accessed July 1, 2018.

Publication types