Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct 31;15(10):e1007891.
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007891. eCollection 2019 Oct.

Diet-microbiome-disease: Investigating diet's influence on infectious disease resistance through alteration of the gut microbiome

Affiliations
Review

Diet-microbiome-disease: Investigating diet's influence on infectious disease resistance through alteration of the gut microbiome

Erica V Harris et al. PLoS Pathog. .

Abstract

Abiotic and biotic factors can affect host resistance to parasites. Host diet and host gut microbiomes are two increasingly recognized factors influencing disease resistance. In particular, recent studies demonstrate that (1) particular diets can reduce parasitism; (2) diets can alter the gut microbiome; and (3) the gut microbiome can decrease parasitism. These three separate relationships suggest the existence of indirect links through which diets reduce parasitism through an alteration of the gut microbiome. However, such links are rarely considered and even more rarely experimentally validated. This is surprising because there is increasing discussion of the therapeutic potential of diets and gut microbiomes to control infectious disease. To elucidate these potential indirect links, we review and examine studies on a wide range of animal systems commonly used in diet, microbiome, and disease research. We also examine the relative benefits and disadvantages of particular systems for the study of these indirect links and conclude that mice and insects are currently the best animal systems to test for the effect of diet-altered protective gut microbiomes on infectious disease. Focusing on these systems, we provide experimental guidelines and highlight challenges that must be overcome. Although previous studies have recommended these systems for microbiome research, here we specifically recommend these systems because of their proven relationships between diet and parasitism, between diet and the microbiome, and between the microbiome and parasite resistance. Thus, they provide a sound foundation to explore the three-way interaction between diet, the microbiome, and infectious disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Direct and indirect relationships between host diet, host gut microbiome, and parasites.
In bees, studies have independently shown that diets modulate resistance to parasites [9,21], diets alter gut microbiomes [75], and gut microbiomes modulate parasitism [90,107]. However, it is not known whether there is an indirect link between the three based on these direct relationships. Alternatively, the host immune system can indirectly alter this potential three-way interaction by modulating antimicrobial peptides or pattern recognition receptors via diet or the gut microbiome to fight parasites [11,110].
Fig 2
Fig 2. Animal systems showing three separate, direct relationships between diet, parasites, and the gut microbiome.
Mice and insects are ideal systems to study the potential indirect, three-way link due to the systems’ controlled host diets, tractable and relatively simple microbiota, and tractability of parasites.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Properties of the gut microbiome that could reduce parasitism.
The protective effects of the gut microbiome may derive from colonization resistance, the abundance and evenness of one or more species at various taxonomic levels, the presence or absence of particular species, or the presence or abundance of certain genes. These scenarios are not exhaustive nor mutually exclusive [107].

References

    1. Lambrechts L, Fellous S, Koella JC. Coevolutionary interactions between host and parasite genotypes. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22: 12–6. 10.1016/j.pt.2005.11.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, Kuris AM. Parasites dominate food web links. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103: 11211–6. 10.1073/pnas.0604755103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolinska J, King KC. Environment can alter selection in host-parasite interactions. 2009;25: 236–244. 10.1016/j.pt.2009.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lazzaro BP, Little TJ. Immunity in a variable world. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;364: 15–26. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013;368: 407–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types