Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;6(4):043504.
doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.4.043504. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

Deep learning-based image quality improvement for low-dose computed tomography simulation in radiation therapy

Affiliations

Deep learning-based image quality improvement for low-dose computed tomography simulation in radiation therapy

Tonghe Wang et al. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography (CT) is desirable for treatment planning and simulation in radiation therapy. Multiple rescanning and replanning during the treatment course with a smaller amount of dose than a single conventional full-dose CT simulation is a crucial step in adaptive radiation therapy. We developed a machine learning-based method to improve image quality of low-dose CT for radiation therapy treatment simulation. We used a residual block concept and a self-attention strategy with a cycle-consistent adversarial network framework. A fully convolution neural network with residual blocks and attention gates (AGs) was used in the generator to enable end-to-end transformation. We have collected CT images from 30 patients treated with frameless brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for this study. These full-dose images were used to generate projection data, which were then added with noise to simulate the low-mAs scanning scenario. Low-dose CT images were reconstructed from this noise-contaminated projection data and were fed into our network along with the original full-dose CT images for training. The performance of our network was evaluated by quantitatively comparing the high-quality CT images generated by our method with the original full-dose images. When mAs is reduced to 0.5% of the original CT scan, the mean square error of the CT images obtained by our method is 1.6 % , with respect to the original full-dose images. The proposed method successfully improved the noise, contract-to-noise ratio, and nonuniformity level to be close to those of full-dose CT images and outperforms a state-of-the-art iterative reconstruction method. Dosimetric studies show that the average differences of dose-volume histogram metrics are < 0.1 Gy ( p > 0.05 ). These quantitative results strongly indicate that the denoised low-dose CT images using our method maintains image accuracy and quality and are accurate enough for dose calculation in current CT simulation of brain SRS treatment. We also demonstrate the great potential for low-dose CT in the process of simulation and treatment planning.

Keywords: computed tomography; low dose; machine learning; radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic flowchart of the proposed algorithm. The upper part shows the training stage. The lower part shows the full-dose CT prediction stage.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Original full-dose CT images and low-dose CT images reconstructed by (b) FBP, (c) ABOCS, (d) U-net, and (e) our method. The two rows correspond to 1% and 0.5% of full mAs, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Full-dose CT and 0.5% mAs of full-dose CT image generated by (b) FBP, (c) ABOCS, (e) U-net, and (g) our method at three different slices (1)–(3). Image differences of (c), (e), and (g) from (a) are shown in (d), (f), and (h), respectively. (i)–(k) The image profiles of which the positions are indicated by yellow dashed lines in (a1), (a2), and (a3), respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) The DVH curves for the PTV, brain stem, chiasm, left optic nerve [ON(L)], and right optic nerve [ON(R)] of one of the patients. (b) Zoomed-in PTV DVH indicated by the dashed line in (a).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box plots of DVH difference metrics for the (a) PTV, (b) brain stem, (c) chiasm, and (d) optic nerve for all patients between 0.5% of full-mAs CT images by our method and original full-dose CT images. The central mark indicates the median; the bottom and top edges of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers extend to the most extreme data points not considered outliers, and the outliers are plotted individually using the “+” symbol.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brenner D. J., Hall E. J., “Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure,” New Engl. J. Med. 357(22), 2277–2284 (2007).NEJMBH10.1056/NEJMra072149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lin E. C., “Radiation risk from medical imaging,” Mayo Clin. Proc. 85(12), 1142–1146 (2010).MACPAJ10.4065/mcp.2010.0260 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen P. K., Wu J. C., “Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk?” Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 9(2), 177–183 (2011).10.1586/erc.10.184 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner D., et al. , “Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT,” Am. J. Roentgenol. 176(2), 289–296 (2001).AJROAM10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lu B., Lu H., Palta J., “A comprehensive study on decreasing the kilovoltage cone-beam CT dose by reducing the projection number,” J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 11(3), 3274 (2010).10.1120/jacmp.v11i3.3274 - DOI - PMC - PubMed