Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;18(5):1161-1169.e5.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.036. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

Gene Variants That Affect Levels of Circulating Tumor Markers Increase Identification of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

Gene Variants That Affect Levels of Circulating Tumor Markers Increase Identification of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

Toshiya Abe et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May.

Abstract

Background & aims: Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) in blood are used as markers to determine the response of patients with cancer to therapy, but are not used to identify patients with pancreatic cancer.

Methods: We obtained blood samples from 504 patients undergoing pancreatic surveillance from 2002 through 2018 who did not develop pancreatic cancer and measured levels of the tumor markers CA19-9, CEA, CA-125, and thrombospondin-2. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FUT3, FUT2, ABO, and GAL3ST2 that have been associated with levels of tumor markers were used to establish SNP-defined ranges for each tumor marker. We also tested the association between additional SNPs (in FUT6, MUC16, B3GNT3, FAM3B, and THBS2) with levels of tumor markers. To calculate the diagnostic specificity of each SNP-defined range, we assigned the patients under surveillance into training and validation sets. After determining the SNP-defined ranges, we determined the sensitivity of SNP-adjusted tests for the tumor markers, measuring levels in blood samples from 245 patients who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from 2010 through 2017.

Results: A level of CA19-9 that identified patients with PDAC with 99% specificity had 52.7% sensitivity. When we set the cut-off levels of CA19-9 based on each SNP, the test for CA19-9 identified patients with PDAC with 60.8% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity. Among patients with FUT3 alleles that encode a functional protein, levels of CA19-9 greater than the SNP-determined cut-off values identified 66.4% of patients with PDAC, with 99.3% specificity. In the validation set, levels of CEA varied among patients with vs without SNP in FUT2, by blood group, and among smokers vs nonsmokers; levels of CA-125 varied among patients with vs without the SNP in GAL3ST2. The use of the SNPs to define the ranges of CEA and CA-125 did not significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of the assays for these proteins. Combining data on levels of CA19-9 and CEA, CA19-9 and CA-125, or CA19-9 and thrombospondin-2 increased the sensitivity of detection of PDAC, but slightly reduced specificity.

Conclusions: Including information on SNPs associated with levels of CA19-9, CEA, and CA-125 can improve the diagnostic accuracy of assays for these tumor markers in the identification of patients with PDAC. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02000089.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Early Detection; Genotype; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any personal or financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic outline of SNP subgroups for CA19-9, CEA and CA125.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
SNP-stratified tumor marker levels in (A) discovery set, (B) validation set controls. For CA19-9, discovery set controls; FUT3+/+ versus FUT3+/−, p=0.0038; all other comparisons, p<0.0001; for validation set controls all comparisons were p<0.001. CEA levels in discovery set controls were lower in FUT2+/non-blood group B (FUT2+/non-B) than all other groups; in the validation set, levels in the FUT2+/non-B group were lower than FUT2−/non-B and FUT2+/B groups controls (p=0.04 for both). For CA125, GAL3ST2 rs12469459-AA subjects had higher levels than rs12469459-TT and rs12469459-AT carriers (P=0.0007 and <0.0001, respectively, discovery set; both p=0.001, validation set). Rs12469459-TT carriers had lower levels than rs12469459-AT carriers (p=0.062 validation set, p=0.028 combined set). FUT2+ subjects include FUT2+/+ and FUT2+/−.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
SNP-stratified tumor marker levels in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: All PDAC cases (top panel), Stage I cases only (bottom panel). CA19-9 levels differed within SNP subgroups (FUT2−/− versus other groups and FUT3−/− versus other groups, p<0.00001, Mann-Whitney).

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2019;69(1):7–34. - PubMed
    1. Canto MI, Almario JA, Schulick RD, et al. Risk of Neoplastic Progression in Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Long-term Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018; 155(3):740–51.e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vasen H, Ibrahim I, Ponce CG, et al. Benefit of Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals: Outcome of Long-Term Prospective Follow-Up Studies From Three European Expert Centers. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2010–9. - PubMed
    1. Konings IC, Harinck F, Poley JW, et al. Prevalence and Progression of Pancreatic Cystic Precursor Lesions Differ Between Groups at High Risk of Developing Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas. 2017;46:28–34. - PubMed
    1. Verna EC, Hwang C, Stevens PD, et al. Pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective cohort of high-risk patients: a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics. Clinical Cancer Res. 2010;16(20):5028–37. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data