Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;35(2):279-285.
doi: 10.1007/s00467-019-04389-2. Epub 2019 Nov 3.

Recalibration of cystatin C using standardized material in Siemens nephelometers

George J Schwartz  1 , Christopher Cox  2 , Jesse C Seegmiller  3 , Paula S Maier  4 , Donna DiManno  4 , Sue L Furth  5 , Bradley A Warady  6 , Alvaro Munoz  2
Affiliations

Recalibration of cystatin C using standardized material in Siemens nephelometers

George J Schwartz et al. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Cystatin C is a key GFR biomarker. Recently, Siemens recalibrated the assay based on certified reference material ERM-DA471/IFCC. The NIH-funded longitudinal chronic kidney disease in children (CKiD) study has > 3000 cystatin C measurements based on a pre-IFCC calibrator provided by Siemens. Since cystatin C values for CKiD are now standardized to IFCC certified reference material, it is important to relate the IFCC-calibrated results to the previous values so that there are no discontinuous results.

Methods: We diluted cystatin C ERM-DA471/IFCC (5.48 mg/L) into buffer and compared results with predicted ones. We then updated the cystatin C application on our BN II nephelometer to provide results based on pre-IFCC and IFCC calibrations of CKiD specimens simultaneously. We assayed 51 previously analyzed sera and 62 fresh additional specimens.

Results: The predicted concentrations from the IFCC standard were consistently 17% higher than the measured values using the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.1686x). Similarly, the re-run and fresh sample concentrations were 17% higher via the IFCC calibration than by the pre-IFCC calibration (y = 1.168x). There was very high reliability in the measurements using the previous calibration for re-run specimens (0.99) and for 33 pristine specimens using IFCC calibration (0.99).

Conclusions: We confirm the recalibration proposed by Siemens. To convert pre-IFCC results to IFCC-calibrated concentrations, the value is multiplied by 1.17. Conversely, one divides IFCC-calibrated results by 1.17 to estimate GFR via previously published pre-IFCC CKiD eGFR equations. For older adolescents, cystatin C has already been standardized and can be directly applied to the CKD-EPI equations.

Keywords: CKiD study; Calibration; Cystatin C; Glomerular filtration rate; Nephelometry; Reference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pre-IFCC calibrated measurements plotted against dilutions of ERM-DA471/IFCC reference material in PBS. Most measurements were performed in duplicate and the average value utilized. Including the reference material used at full strength (5.48 mg/L), there are 20 predicted values over the physiologic range plotted for the relationship. The line pre-IFCC = 0.856 x IFCC reference) depicts the excellent fit of measurements via the pre-IFCC calibration method to the dilutions of the reference material.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of serum specimens simultaneously measured using pre-IFCC and IFCC calibrated methods on a Siemens BN II. Horizontal lines indicate 51 specimens previously run slightly over a year previously with the line spanning the two values of the old (pre-IFCC) calibration. Diamonds identify 62 pristine specimens measured using pre-IFCC and IFCC calibrations. Open squares indicate values from GJS measured concomitantly with each run of 10–20 sera. The line describes the relationship between old and new calibrations (IFCC = 1.168 x pre-IFCC calibration); the intercept was not significant.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schwartz GJ, Schneider MF, Maier PS, Moxey-Mims M, Dharnidharka VR, Warady BA, Furth SL, Munoz A (2012) Improved equations estimating GFR in children with chronic kidney disease using an immunonephelometric determination of cystatin C. Kidney Int 82 (4):445–453. doi:10.1038/ki.2012.169 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G (2002) Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. AmJKidney Dis 40 (2):221–226 - PubMed
    1. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, Feldman HI, Froissart M, Kusek J, Rossert J, Van Lente F, Bruce RD 3rd, Zhang YL, Greene T, Levey AS (2008) Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 51 (3):395–406. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inker LA, Eckfeldt J, Levey AS, Leiendecker-Foster C, Rynders G, Manzi J, Waheed S, Coresh J (2011) Expressing the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) cystatin C equations for estimating GFR with standardized serum cystatin C values. Am J Kidney Dis 58 (4):682–684. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.05.019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grubb A, Blirup-Jensen S, Lindstrom V, Schmidt C, Althaus H, Zegers I (2010) First certified reference material for cystatin C in human serum ERM-DA471/IFCC. ClinChemLab Med 48 (11):1619–1621 - PubMed

Publication types