Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Mar;65(1):12-20.
doi: 10.1111/adj.12733. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

Clinical efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of gingivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Z Akram  1 , S S Shafqat  2 , S Aati  1 , O Kujan  1 , A Fawzy  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Clinical efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of gingivitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Z Akram et al. Aust Dent J. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of gingivitis.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched up to May 2019. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and/or controlled clinical trials were considered. Studies consisting of ≥10 patients per group clinically diagnosed with gingivitis were selected that compared the efficacy of probiotics in any form with placebo. The primary outcome measure was bleeding on probing (BOP) and gingival index (GI), while the secondary outcome measure was plaque index (PI). Forest plots were created reporting weighted mean difference (WMD) of outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: A total of 10 double-blind placebo-parallel RCTs were included. All studies showed that probiotic administration was effective in the treatment of gingivitis at follow-up. The mean percentage of BOP ranged from 11.87% to 21.7% in the probiotics group and from 15% to 33% in the placebo groups at follow-up, respectively. Considering the effects of Lactobacillus reuteri, the overall mean difference for GI (WMD = -0.48, 95% CI = -1.69 to 0.72, P = 0.42) and PI (WMD = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.23 to 0.61, P = 0.37) did not show any statistical significance between probiotic and placebo groups.

Conclusions: The outcomes of this review show weak evidence to support the use of probiotics in reducing inflammatory periodontal parameters in gingivitis. Significant heterogeneity and limited available data may reduce the impact of these conclusions.

Keywords: Bleeding on probing; gingivitis; inflammation; meta-analysis; probiotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Trombelli L, Farina R, Silva CO, Tatakis DN. Plaque-induced gingivitis: case definition and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol 2018;45:S44-S67.
    1. Rüdiger S, Carlen A, Meurman J, Kari K, Olsson J. Dental biofilms at healthy and inflamed gingival margins. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:524-530.
    1. Jepsen S, Blanco J, Buchalla W, et al. Prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level: consensus report of group 3 of joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2017;44:S85-S93.
    1. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN. Periodontal diseases. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2017;3:17038.
    1. Montero E, Iniesta M, Rodrigo M, et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of the adjunctive use of probiotics in the treatment of gingivitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2017;44:708-716.

LinkOut - more resources